중국에서 보험자대위에 관한 섭외중재합의의 효력에 관한 연구

• 발행기관: 한국민사소송법학회
• 저자명: 孔金萍
• 간행물 정보: 『민사소송』제24권 제1호, 107~130쪽, 전체 24쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2020.02.28

영문 초록

Regarding the issue of “whether the arbitration agreement signed between the insured and a third party in property insurance is binding on the insurer” in international disputes, China has not made clear provisions in the law, the basic point that China ’s Supreme People ’s Court hold is that unless the insurer agrees, it is not binding in principle. In November 2019, Article 98 of the “Minutes of Civil and Commercial Trial Work Conference of the National Court” promulgated by the Supreme People s Court of China, provided that although arbitration agreements in domestic cases are recognized as binding on insurance companies, they are not recognized in international cases. Extra-territorial countries and regions generally recognize the effectiveness of the arbitration agreement on the insurer. As a result, in related international trade cases, Chinese court judgment have been refused recognition and enforcement abroad. From the perspectives of the principle of autonomy of private law, interpretation of meaning, system interpretation, similarity of insurance subrogation right and creditor s rights transfer, and the validity of the litigation jurisdiction agreement to the insurer, the arbitration agreement should be deemed to be valid for the insurer.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 중재합의의 보험대위채권자에의 효력여부에 관한 고찰

Ⅲ. 외국에서 중재합의의 효력에 관한 고찰

Ⅳ. 결언

키워드

중재합의 보험대위권 대위소송 채권양도 대위채권 Arbitration agreement Right of subrogation of insurance Subrogation litigation Creditor s rights transfer Right of subrogation