노인의 삶의 만족도 유형별 경제적 요인과의 관계 연구

• 영문명: A Study on the Relationship with Economic Factors by Type of Life Satisfaction of the Elderly
• 발행기관: 사회복지정책실천회
• 저자명: 박선숙(Park, Sun-Sook)
• 간행물 정보: 『사회복지정책과 실천』사회복지정책과 실천 6권 3호, 117~158쪽, 전체 42쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 사회복지학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2020.12.30

국문 초록

본 연구는 노인의 삶의 만족도 유형과 경제적 요인과의 연관관계를 분석하기 위하여 2019년 한국복지패널의 14차년도 자료를 사용하였으며, 대응일치분석을 적용하였다. 투입 경제적 요인은 소득원천, 경제활동 유형, 주택유형을 선정하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 군집분석을 하여 노인의 삶의 만족도를 유형화한 결과 ‘생활취약형’, ‘주거가족만족형’, ‘사회관계만족형’, ‘건강소득취약형’, ‘생활안정형’, ‘건강취약만족형’ 등 6개 유형으로 분류되었다. 둘째, 소득원천에서는 ‘취약계층집단’은 ‘건강소득취약형’, ‘생활취약형’ 유형과, ‘임대/고용/자영업/상용직 집단’은 ‘생활안정형’, ‘농축어업형 집단’과 ‘임시일용직 집단’은 ‘주거가족만족형’, ‘사회관계만족형’과, ‘건강취약만족형’은 ‘임대/고용/자영/상용직 집단’과 밀접한 연관성이 있었다. 셋째, 경제활동 유형에서는 ‘생활안정형’은 ‘상용직 집단’, ‘고용주/자영업 집단’, ‘무급가족종사 집단’과, ‘생활취약형’과 ‘건강소득취약형’은 ‘실업/비경제활동 집단’과, ‘주거가족만족형’은 ‘일용직 집단’과, ‘건강취약만족형’은 ‘무급가족종사 집단’과 ‘실업/비경제활동 집단’과, ‘실업/비경제활동 집단’은 ‘생활취약형’, ‘건강소득형’, ‘건강취약만족형’과 밀접한 연관성이 있었다. 넷째, 주택 유형에서는 ‘일반아파트 집단’은 ‘생활안정형’, ‘임대아파트 집단’과 ‘다가구단독 집단’은 ‘생활취약형’과, ‘사회관계만족형’은 ‘빌라연립 집단’과, ‘건강취약만족형’이나 ‘주거가족만족형’은 ‘일반단독 집단’, ‘다세대주택 집단’과 밀접한 연관이 있는 것으로 나타났다.

영문 초록

This study aimed to find an association between the types of the aged’ life satisfaction and their economic factor determinants of life satisfaction by appling correspondence analysis. An analysis was conducted on the aged over 65 years old from the data of the ‘2019 Korean Welfare Panel’. The input variables consist of economic factors of the aged such as source of income, type of economic activities, and housing type. The major findings are as follows. First, as a result of a clustering analysis of the elderly life satisfaction, they are classified as ‘bad life satisfaction type’, ‘good housing and family satisfaction type’, ‘good social relation type’, ‘bad health and income type’, ‘good life satisfaction type’, ‘bad health and good life satisfaction type’. Second, in terms of income source, between ‘bad income group’ and ‘bad health and income type’, or ‘bad life satisfaction type’, between ‘rental/employer/self-employed/regular-employed group’ and ‘good life satisfaction type’, between ‘agricultural or fishing income group’ or the ‘temporary employment group’ and ‘good housing and family satisfaction type’ and ‘good social relation type’, between ‘rental/employer/ self-employed/regular-employed group’ and ‘bad health and good life satisfaction type’ are closely related. Third, in terms of economic activities type, between ‘regular-employed group’, ‘employer/self-employment group’, or ‘unpaid family worker group’ and ‘good life satisfaction type’, between ‘unemployed/non-economic activities group’ and ‘bad life satisfaction type’ or ‘bad health and income type’, between ‘temporary employed group’ and ‘good housing and family satisfaction type’, between ‘unpaid family worker group’ or ‘unemployed/non-economic activities group’ and ‘bad health good life satisfaction type’, between ‘unemployed/non-economic activities group’ and ‘bad life satisfaction type’, ‘good health and income type’, and ‘bad health and good life satisfaction type’ are closely related. Fourth, in term of housing type, between ‘general apartments group’ and ‘good life satisfaction type’, between ‘rental apartments group’ or ‘multi-family single housing group’ and ‘bad life satisfaction type’, between ‘villa or united housing group’ and ‘good social relation type’, between ‘general single housing group’ or ‘multi-family single housing group’ and ‘bad health and good life satisfaction type’ or ‘good housing and family satisfaction type’ are closely related.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 이론적 고찰

Ⅲ. 연구방법

Ⅳ. 연구결과

Ⅴ. 결론 및 논의

참고문헌

키워드

노인의 삶의 만족도 유형 소득 경제활동 유형 주택유형 대응일치분석 Aged’s Life Satisfaction Source of Income Type of Economic Activities House Type Correspondence Analysis