본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

2007년 상법 개정 시안 중 최저자본금제도 폐지에 관한 소고

이용수 224

영문명
What are the Issues to Abolishment of the Minimum Capital Provision upon the 2007 Government Amendment Draft of Korean Commercial code - On the perspective of Legal Capital System in Korean corporation
발행기관
전남대학교 법학연구소
저자명
이상주(LEE, Sangjoo)
간행물 정보
『법학논총』제28권 제2호, 93~120쪽, 전체 28쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2008.12.30
6,160

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The 2007 Government Amendment Draft of Korean Commercial code suggests that the minimum capital provision with regard to establishment of a corporation (§329 ①) shall be abolished, which requests promoters to furnish \50,000,000. It was intended to protect the creditors of corporation and deter a overflow of establishment of corporations. Therefore, whether it be still needed or not depends on the fact that whether it be effective towards the goals. Unfortunately, this kind of reasoning has not yet been scrutinized with the perspective of legal capital system of Korean commercial law, which is covering the whole version of that law and could be regarded as the ground for the minimum capital provision. Legal capital system is a basic and core rule provided for the goal of the protection of the creditors as well, and it runs through it. The point is that this legal capital system, which has been recognized as a coercive rule, is now being challenged by the recent skepticism globally. When it comes to US, they seems not resort to the capital system the protection of the creditors any more, has no systems like minimum capital provision neither. Secondly, Japan has abolished the minimum capital provision, ¥10,000,000, at the amendment of new corporation law in 2005. They came to think it is needless to stick to the system for the purpose of the protection of the creditors, and better to find other way more effective. Lastly, the EU nations, based on the civil law system, still got the regulations stem from the legal capital system. However, law makers and scholars proposed a idea of ineffectiveness of the role of the system in order for the protection of the creditors of corporations. Some of them even suggest the annulment of the system and the minimum capital provision as well. Theoretically and empirically the minimum capital provision, based on the legal capital system, seems to have lost the principal role as it has not been effective to protect the risk of corporations, offer information to the creditors, protect the creditors with a contract nor non-contract neither. On top of it, it plays no significant role to deter the overflowing of the establishment of corporations. In conclusion, the proposal of revision, on the theme hereupon, seems appropriate considering the global trends, and the theoretical and empirical perspectives.

목차

Ⅰ. 서설
Ⅱ. 최저자본금 제도와 채권자보호
Ⅲ. 최저자본금 제도와 주식회사의 남설 방지
Ⅳ. 결어

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이상주(LEE, Sangjoo). (2008).2007년 상법 개정 시안 중 최저자본금제도 폐지에 관한 소고. 법학논총, 28 (2), 93-120

MLA

이상주(LEE, Sangjoo). "2007년 상법 개정 시안 중 최저자본금제도 폐지에 관한 소고." 법학논총, 28.2(2008): 93-120

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제