학술논문
미국의 중재판정 취소에 관한 연구 -판례법과 제정법의 조화를 중심으로
이용수 25
- 영문명
- A Study of the Vacating of Arbitral Awards by Finding Harmony of Case Law with Statutory Law of the United States
- 발행기관
- 한국중재학회
- 저자명
- 김진현 정용균
- 간행물 정보
- 『중재연구』 제22권 제2호, 125~157쪽, 전체 33쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 무역학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2012.08.30
6,760원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study is to vindicate the vacation of arbitral awards in the United States. It focuses on the harmony of case law with statutory law of the United States. Until the early twentieth century, the American legal system, having adopted the English common law view, harbored a hostile attitude toward arbitration. The purpose of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) of the United States, enacted in 1925, was to eliminate the hostile attitude of courts toward arbitration. Congress is to enforce arbitration agreements into which parties have entered and to place arbitration agreements upon the same footing as other contracts. The structure of grounds for vacating arbitration awards has two layers. One is of vacating grounds with statutory origins, such as the FAA and the Uniform Arbitration Act, and the other, of vacating grounds originating from a nonstatutory, case law background. For a while, vacatur based on case law has coexisted with vacatur on statutory grounds for arbitration awards. After the Supreme Court decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., however, the justification of vacating based on case law has weakened. Post-Hall Street decisions of circuit courts show ways to deal with manifest disregard of the law. One of them is the harmonization of the case law grounds for vacating with the statutory grounds. It seems that the manifest-disregard-of-law and public-policy exceptions show a possibility of survival after Hall Street. However, other nonstatutory grounds for vacation of arbitration awards have no firm basis after Hall Street.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 미국의 중재법
Ⅲ. 제정법의 중재판정 취소사유
Ⅳ. 판례법의 중재판정 취소 사유
Ⅴ. 제정법과 판례법의 조화
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!