국제상사중재에서 중재판정부의 권한과 임시적 처분에 관한 연구

• 영문명: The Powers and Interim Measures of the Arbitral Tribunal in International Commercial Arbitration
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 이강빈
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제18권 제2호, 103~127쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.06.30

영문 초록

This paper is to research the powers and interim measures of the arbitral tribunal in the arbitral proceedings of the international commercial arbitration under arbitration legislation and arbitration rules including the UNCITRAL Model Law and Arbitration Rules. The powers of the arbitral tribunal may be found within the arbitration agreement or any arbitration rules chosen by the parties, or the chosen procedural law. The power of the arbitral tribunal to decide its own jurisdiction is one of the fundamental principles of international commercial arbitration. It is a power which is now found in nearly all modern arbitration and rules of arbitration. Where an arbitral tribunal has been appointed then it will usually have the power to proceed with the arbitration in the event that a party fails to appear. It cannot force a party to attend but it may sanction the failure. While the arbitral tribunal can direct the parties to attend and give evidence the arbitral tribunal has no power to compel a party to give evidence. The arbitral tribunal may continue the arbitration in the absence of the party or its failure to submit evidence and make an award on the evidence before it. Under most of arbitration legislation and arbitration rules, the arbitral tribunal has the power to appoint experts and obtain expert evidence. The power to order a party to disclose documents in its possession is a power given to the arbitral tribunal by many national laws and by most arbitration rules. The arbitral tribunal cannot, however, compel disclosure and in the case where a party refuses to disclosure documents then the sanctions that the arbitral tribunal can impose must be ascertained from the applicable rules or the relevant procedural law. A number of arbitration rules and national laws allow for the arbitral tribunal to correct errors within the award. Most of arbitration legislation and arbitration rules permit the arbitral tribunal to grant orders for interim measure of protection. Article 17(1) of the Revised UNCITRAL Model Law of 2006 states: Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may, at the request of a party, grant interim measures. Interim measures of protection usually take such forms as (1) conservatory measures intended to prevent irreparable damage and maintain the status quo; (2) conservatory measures Intended to preserve evidence or assets. Orders for interim measures by the arbitral tribunal are not self-enforcing. However, the arbitral tribunal must have the powers necessary to make interim measures effective. The Article 17 B of the Revised UNCITRAL Model Law of 2006 provides applications for preliminary orders and conditions for granting preliminary orders. And the Article 17 H provides recognition of enforcement of interim measures. In conclusion, the revised articles with regard to interim measures of the UNCITRAL Model Law of 2006 would contribute significantly to the security of the effectiveness of interim measures in international commercial arbitration. Therefore, Korean Arbitration Law and Arbitration Rules would be desirable to admit such revised articles with regard interim measures.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 중재판정부의 권한 확인

Ⅲ. 중재판정부의 일반적 권한

Ⅳ. 중재판정부의 임시적 처분권한

Ⅴ. 중재판정부의 임시적 처분의 실효성 확보제도

Ⅵ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

중재판정부 자기권한심사 중재절차 심리 증거 감정인 중재판정 임시적 처분 예비명령 Arbitral tribunal Competence-competence Arbitral proceeding Hearing Evidence Expert Arbitral award Interim measure Preliminary order