ICC 중재법원의 판정사례에 관한 연구 -이집트와 유고슬라비아의 철강제수출입분쟁사건을 중심으로

• 영문명: A Study on the ICC Arbitration Case - Disputes of Steel Bars Ex-Im Contract between Egypt & Yugoslav -
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 한재필
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제18권 제1호, 49~69쪽, 전체 21쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2008.03.30

영문 초록

This study is to analyze the case law on the disputes of the ex-im contract of steel bar from Yugoslav to Egypt, for which awards were made by the ICC Arbitration Court, trying to find out the characteristic approach of the tribunal toward arbitration case dealing with socialistic country, Yugoslav and Islamic Egypt. An Egyptian importer and an Yugoslavian Exporter concluded a contract, with an option to purchase an additional quantity, for the steel bar. The importer exercised this option as provided in the contract. But the exporter refused to honor the option, due to the fact that the world market price for the steel bar has gone up. As a result, the importer had to purchase the steel bar as a replacement from a Rumanian company at the price higher than the original contract. And it has initiated arbitration under the arbitration clause at the ICC Arbitration Court to claim compensation for the loss due to the price difference. CISG and ULIS were closely studied along with the Yugoslav Law to determine whether the exporter could be exempted from the liability to damages. But the tribunal denied to accept the exporter s contention. The tribunal decided that the importer was entitled to damages due to the exporter s failure to deliver the additional quantity of goods at the original price. It was due to the fact that the price increase was not extremely sudden & high enough to exceed a reasonable entrepreneurial risk and also could be taken into account when concluding the contract.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 중재사건의 내용

Ⅲ. 준거법의 선택 및 법리적 타당성

Ⅵ. 종합 및 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

ICC 중재법원 통례적 기업가위험 CISG 79조 ULIS 85조 ICC Arbitration Court Reasonable Entrepreneurial Risk CISG Art. 79 ULIS Art. 85