중재합의의 제3자에 대한 효력

• 영문명: Arbitration Agreement s Binding Effect on Non-Signatory
• 발행기관: 한국중재학회
• 저자명: 김지홍
• 간행물 정보: 『중재연구』 제17권 제3호, 101~119쪽, 전체 19쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2007.12.30

영문 초록

Arbitration is contractual by nature. One cannot be required to submit to arbitration any dispute which he has not agreed to so submit. As commercial transactions become increasingly complex, involving multiple parties and numerous contracts for a single transaction, however, limiting the parties who are subject to arbitration to only those who have signed a contract containing an arbitration clause would frustrate the purpose of such arbitration clause and might lead to injustice among the relevant parties. Therefore, U.S. courts have recognized a number of theories under which non-signatories may be bound to the arbitration agreement of others ： (1) incorporation by reference; (2) assumption; (3)agency; (4) veil-piercing/alter ego; and (5) estoppel. Incorporation by reference and veil-piercing theories have already been recognized by Korean courts. Agency theory and estoppel theory are not recognizable under Korean law. However, the same or similar result may be achieved by applying the third party beneficiary theory or assumption by third party theory. Although a couple of Supreme Court cases appear to be at odds with the assumption theory, on the basis of the recent amendments to the Arbitration Act, such court precedents can be and should be reversed.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 중재합의의 제3자에 대한 효력이 문제되는 경우

Ⅲ. 중재합의의 제3자에 대한 효력

Ⅳ. 결론

참고문헌

Abstract

키워드

중재합의 중재계약 약관의 계약 편입 제3자를 위한 계약 제3자의 부담을 목적으로 하는 계약 법인격부인 금반언 선행행위에 모순되는 거동 금지 특정승계인 arbitration agreement non signatory incorporation by reference agency piercing the corporate vail alter egoestoppel