한국어에서 형용사 구하기

• 발행기관: 한국생성문법학회
• 저자명: 최기용(Choi, Kiyong)
• 간행물 정보: 『생성문법연구』제29권 제2호, 441~458쪽, 전체 18쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 언어학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2019.04.30

영문 초록

Despite the standard assumption that Korean has a category of Adj(ective), it has been repeatedly pointed out that traditional criteria distinguishing Adj from V(erb) in Korean are not solid. Furthermore Kim (2002) and Yeo (2004a, 2005) explicitly argue that Adj is absent in Korean. In this squib, I present one new piece of evidence for the existence of the Adjective category in Korean. I also claim that the arguments for the absence of Adj in Korean in Kim (2002) and Yeo(2004a, 2005) either weaken or lose ground. If this proposal is on the right track, it implies that Korean and English are the same in having a category of Adj and the differences regarding the syntactic and semantic properties of Adj in both languages stem from the difference in its morphological property: An English Adj is [free], while a Korean Adj is[bound].

목차

1. 머리말

2. 형용사와 동사를 가르는 기존 기준들

3. little v의 음성적 실현: 범주 기반 기준

4. M. Kim(2002) 및 S. Yeo(2004a, 2005) 검토

5. 결론 및 앞으로의 과제들

키워드

adjectives psychological predicates little v Sino-Korean nouns (-e) ha- attributive function -i- copula Korean head movement free/bound