학술논문
체포영장제도의 적정성 재검토
이용수 323
- 영문명
- 59)Revisiting the Legitimacy of the Arrest Warrant Framework
- 발행기관
- 한국형사소송법학회
- 저자명
- 박형관(Park, Hyung-Kwan)
- 간행물 정보
- 『형사소송 이론과 실무』제10권 제2호, 1~30쪽, 전체 30쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2018.09.30
6,400원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
About 20 years have passed since the arrest warrant system was implemented. From a comparative legal viewpoint, the arrest warrant system in Korea is very unique. A detention warrant can be issued after an arrest
or even if the suspect has not been arrested. Before an arrest warrant is issued under the Korean Criminal Procedure Act, in addition to a suspicion of crime having been committed, there must be the suspect’s refusal to
attend or a high probability of failing to attend”. Accordingly, the arrest warrant takes on the character of an arrest warrant for detention and an arrest warrant for investigation. This is a mechanical integration of qualitatively different types of warrants, and as such many concerns have been raised since the introduction of the system. Even if detention is deemed necessary, arresting becomes difficult if it does not meet the requirements of the subpoena. On the other hand, the arrest warrant is readily issued if there is reason to believe that there might be a refusal of
attendance; hence, the over-issuance of ‘arrest warrants against wanted criminal’might become problematic. Furthermore, issuing a detention warrant without going through the arresting process may not be faithful in
protecting the human rights of the accused because it is decided in a relatively short period of time and in just one hearing.
There is clearly a need to address the plethora of defects and shortcomings of the current arrest warrant system and make necessary revisions. First of all, the arrest and detention system should be unified
with detention preceding the arrest and the practice of issuing detention warrants without arresting the suspect should be abolished. Arrests should always precede the issuance of a detention warrant with the arrest warrant
clearly designated for either detention or for investigation.
It is necessary to newly establish or expand summary court or summary prosecutor s office to ensure a prompt decision process whether or not arrest warrants are issued. Further, the above measures must be adhered to
if there is a need for interim measures or conditional release of the accused in the proceedings after the request or execution of the arrest warrant. To this end, the introduction of a magistrate’s court system and a quasi
prosecutor system would be effective in keeping with a timely, just, and reasonable arrest warrant system. The improvement of the arrest warrant system is a way in which to advance criminal proceedings to more
faithfully protect human rights of both the accused and the victim.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론 - 아직 해결되지 않은 문제들
Ⅱ. 체포영장 제도의 운용 모습
Ⅲ. 개선의 방향
Ⅳ. 결론
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!