『後漢書』 「東夷列傳」 〈韓傳〉에 대한 분석

• 영문명: Analysis Study on 『Huhanso』 「doingyiyuljeon」 〈hanjon〉 - Comparative study on 『Samkukji』 〈hanjon〉 -
• 발행기관: 백산학회
• 저자명: 기수연(Kee Su yeon)
• 간행물 정보: 『백산학보』第57號, 143~183쪽, 전체 41쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 역사학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2000.12.30

영문 초록

This paper intends to reconsider the validity of 『Huhanso』 as a historical material by the comparative study with 『Samkukji』 which says different records in Korean part. Many researchers’ rationale for their denial of 『Huhanso』 『Huhanso』 as a valid historical material lies in two assertions: first, 『Huhanso』 was published approximately one century after 『Samkukji』 was edited Second, the author of 『Huhanso』 randomly copied and pasted the content of 『Samkukji』 「Doingyijon」without any deep-leveled research. However, the study on 『Wrrak』, which is known to be consulted by ’s author when editing proves that 『Huhanso』 was more close to 『Wirak』 in it’s records whereas 『Huhanso』 was not coherent with a lot of contradictions in it’s content. The assertion of non-validity of 『Huhanso』, therefore, has the conflict in its rationale. Rather, I claim that the author of 『Huhanso』 corrected the wrong part of 『Samkukji』 records based on other historical materials in his time.

목차

I. 서론

II. 『後漢書』 〈韓傳〉에 대한 기존의 견해

III. 『後漢書』 〈韓傳〉의 특징

IV. 『後漢書』 〈韓傳〉의 내용 검토

V. 결론

Abstract