학술논문
就業規則制度의 比較法的 一考察
이용수 81
- 영문명
- A Comparative Analysis on the System of Works Rules
- 발행기관
- 경희법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김철(Kim, Chul)
- 간행물 정보
- 『경희법학』제45권 제4호, 219~259쪽, 전체 41쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 민법
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.12.30
7,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
The works rules, with the purpose of making a certain regulation dealing with uniform and systemic working conditions with employees promptly and equally, are collective working rules, in which government delegated her power for making and changing such rules to employers, with having legal binding. The roles of works rules are predictability for reducing conflicts through making clear rights and obligation between employer and employee, and policy for appropriately achieving business works. Moreover, works rules prevent employers from doing arbitrary interpretations, and play a role as social norms or functions to guarantee justifiable procedures dealing with critical issues to employees such as disciplinary measures and dismissal. Accordingly, if collective working structures
should not be changed, works rules’ function as collective working rules would not be changed in the future in that the structure of working conditions will be decided collectively.
The decreasing trend of joining rate of labor union is coming all around the world, and thus the frequency of collective agreement also is decreasing continuously. It means growing influence of works rules. The nations operating the system of works rules according to decree-law are Korea, Japan, France, China, India, Indonesia, Thailand,
Vietnam, Poland, Czech, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Mongolia, etc., and, on the other hand, the nations operating the system according to custom of labor relations are Sweden, UK, US, etc. Meanwhile, ‘Betriebsvereinbarung’ in Germany and workplace agreement in Italy are likely similar to works rules. In other words, presumably no country does not admit works rules or its relevant rules like employee’s code. Especially, in Korea, real practice in labor relations depends on the content of works rules. Therefore, it, in labor management, is important how to apply and operate the provisions of works rules. In reality, numerous labor disputes have been occurred in terms of interpretation or application of works rules.
The major three problems in Korea are as follows. First, as nature of works rules, what is the legal ground that works rules, made unilaterally by employers without the equal treatment between labor and management, can have binding power against employees regarding working conditions. Second, in ‘Disadvantageous Change’ of works
rules under the firm case-based theory of rationality, there is the decree-law requiring ‘consent’ from employees group. However, even if employers violate the rule, the works rules could be valid based alternatively on its rationality as a consent. The very thing can be a matter. Finally, under the flexible labor market, works rules as a collective
working rule cannot actively cope with the current trend getting more individual and diversified in terms of contract of employment. In order to resolve the three problems, this thesis suggested the ‘social autonomy theory’ as an alternative of existing theories, and for strong persuasion, argued real each issue and tried to prove its validity and
receptiveness. As for the unilateralism of employer to make and change works rules, this thesis also indicated not only current control from decree-law, governmental agency, and labor union, but also direct control methods from the ‘Joint Labor-Management Conference’, in terms of law-making policy. The actual interest of this study is, as an
alternative to limit the rationality theory’s intervention into works rules, to guarantee the justification in procedure through operating by the joint labor-management conference.
Lastly, the system of works rules under the labor standards act has played an important role in labor-management relations. As growing flexibility of labor fast,
however, it is alleged both to introduce new legal systems such as labor contract theory
and Notice of Change or Termination, and to reform the current system like
‘Betriebsrat’. Hopefully, this thesis will give a
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 日本
Ⅲ. 中國
Ⅳ. 프랑스
Ⅴ. 獨逸
Ⅵ. 英國
Ⅶ. 폴란드
Ⅷ. 示唆點
키워드
근로조건
취업규칙
근로계약
단체교섭
단결권
개별적 근로관계
집단적노사관계
근로관계
고용의 유연화
노동유연성
종업원대표위원회
기업위원회
노사협의회
노동조합
working conditions
works rules
contract of employment
collective agreement
collective bargaining
Joint Labor-Management Conference
labor union
Contingent worker
equal treatment
explicit statement of working conditions, etc.
해당간행물 수록 논문
- The Present Status of Development of Nuclear Energy and Policy Issues for Green Energy in Germany
- Present status of industrial utilization of nuclear energy and legal adjustment strategy for activation in Russia
- 사이버공간상 프라이버시 개념의 변화와 그에 대한 법적 대응방안
- The Present Status of Industrial Utilization of Nuclear Energy and Adjustment Strategy for Activation in the United States of America
- The present status of the debate of the use of nuclear power in Australia
- 就業規則制度의 比較法的 一考察
- Regulatory System related to Industrial Utilizations of Nuclear Energy in Korea
- The Present Status of Development of Nuclear Energy and Policy Issues for Green Energy in China
- Present Status and Prospects:
- 집합건물의 대지공유와 그 분할의 청구
- 경희법학 제45권 제4호 목차
- 병원개설자의 조직의무와 책임근거
- 东亚地区侵权法实现一体化的基础及研究任务
- 계약해제의 요건에 관한 비교법적 고찰과 입법론적 쟁점
- 특경법 제3조 제1항의 ‘이득액’ 평가에 대한 검토
- 이상정, 「미술과 법」
- A Critical Appraisal of Current Nuclear Energy Law & Policy in Japan:
- 제사주재자의 결정방법에 관한 小考
- Liability for Nuclear Harm under the German Atomic Energy Act
- 통신의 비밀보장에 관한 연구
- LES POLITIQUES ET LE DROIT DE L’ÉNERGIE NUCLÉAIRE EN FRANCE
- 發 刊 辭
- 채권자대위소송의 실질적 보장과 중복소송
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!