국제법 준수를 위한 국내재판소와 국제재판소의 새로운 관계 정립

• 영문명: A New Relationship between Domestic Courts and International Courts with respect to Compliance with International Law
• 발행기관: 국제법평론회
• 저자명: 이주윤(Lee, Joo Yun)
• 간행물 정보: 『국제법평론』제45호, 71~96쪽, 전체 26쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2016.09.30

영문 초록

While classic international law usually regulates external relations among nations which constitute international community, modern international law deals with various internationalized internal matters such as international human rights law, international investment law, international criminal law and international environmental law, etc. The areas which the jurisdiction between international courts and domestic courts interacts are gradually increasing, and there are rule of exhaustion of local remedies, principle of complementarity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, margin of appreciation doctrine of the European Court of Human Rights and preliminary rulings procedure of the Court of Justice of the EU which handle with this interaction in international law. First, the rule of exhaustion of local remedies makes international courts to focus upon material international legal problems which could be difficult to solve in national courts, but it can still be short of legal remedies of individuals. In addition, while international courts play an incidental role compared to domestic courts according to the principle of complementarity under the Rome Statute of the ICC and the margin of appreciation doctrine of the ECtHR, the preliminary rulings procedure of the CJEU can enable national courts to depend on international courts. It thus follows that there hardly exist consistent principles and rules concerning the relationship between international courts and domestic courts. In conclusion, it is essential to strike a balance in the relationship between international courts and domestic courts in order to comply with international law. Therefore, some proposals could be made that international courts should decide which courts are the best interpreter and executor in the cases involved, contribute to strong compliance with international law, and an international institution has to be established to make jurisdictional criteria. Besides, from the perspective of domestic courts so as to comply with international law, it seems that the interpretation of friendliness towards international law, the acceptance of binding character of international courts judgments, the use of international law experts in national court proceedings, international law education for domestic judges, and the opportunity for dialogue between national judges and international judges are needed.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며

Ⅱ. 국제재판소와 국내재판소의 관계 문제와 새로운 접근법

1. 국내구제수단완료 원칙

2. 보충성 원칙과 일사부재리

3. 재량의 여지 이론

4. 선결적 부탁절차

5. 국제재판소와 국내재판소의

새로운 관계 설정을 위한방안

Ⅲ. 국내재판소의 국제법 준수 문제와 국제재판소와의 관계 정립 방안

1. 미국의 법원

2. 독일의 법원

3. 우리나라의 법원

4. 국내재판소의 실효적인 국제법 준수 및 국제재판소와의관계 설정 방안

Ⅳ. 결 론

키워드

국제재판소 국내재판소 국제법 준수 국내구제수단완료 원칙 보충성 원칙 재량의 여지 이론 선결적 부탁절차 International Courts Domestic Courts Compliance with International Law Rule of Exhaustion of Local Remedies Principle of Complementarity Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Preliminary Rulings Procedure