경찰부패와 경찰옴부즈만 - 각국 사례를 중심으로

• 영문명: Police Corruption and Police Ombudsman
• 발행기관: 한국부패학회
• 저자명: 문성호(Sung Ho Moon)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국부패학회보』제6권 제1호, 143~174쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 민법
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2002.06.30

영문 초록

Almost all the countries in the world except Korea maintain the local autonomy police system. In addition, external controls on police are exerted by national and local assembly, court and press, etc. in these nations. Nonetheless the police ombudsman system such as "independent, civil and external" review agencies were (and are) established separately independent of such an existing external control agencies. For example, Civil Complaints Review Board (CCRB) in New York City, Police Complaints Authority (PCA) and Police Ombudsman in South Australia and Britain is operating. There are divergent forms of police ombudsman all over the world. In the case of South Korean system, police is completely state-centered. Therefore Provicial Councils have no power to touch or review on police at all. Korean National Assembly cannot review all the line-police operations and administration. I propose the introduction of the police ombudsman to be issued in the Korea from now on, together with local police system.

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 경찰옴부즈만의 개념

Ⅲ. 호주의 경찰옴부즈만 모델

Ⅳ. 영국의 경찰비리 조사 기구

Ⅴ. 미국 뉴욕의 경찰비리심사 민간위원회(CCRB)

Ⅳ. 우리나라 도입문제

Ⅶ. 맺는 말

참고문헌