｢금강살리기 사업｣의 갈등구조 분석

• 영문명: The Analysis of the Structure of Conflict of 'the Revitalizing Project of Geum River'
• 발행기관: 한국부패학회
• 저자명: 최병학(Choi Byoung Hahk)
• 간행물 정보: 『한국부패학회보』제15권 제3호, 115~139쪽, 전체 25쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 민법
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.09.30

영문 초록

The government said that the current 'revitalizing project of the four rivers' of the government is promoted to tackle the chronic water shortage and damages from flood through the policies such as preparing for weather change, the symbiotic relationship of the nature and human beings, territorial recreation, regional balanced development and establishment of the foundation for green growth. However various conflicts are occurring in the process to promote the recent 'revitalizing project of the four rivers', and 'the revitalizing project of Geum River' is not an exception. Here upon this study first analyzed the actual condition of conflicts among the central government, the local government on a broader unit area and the basic local government, residents and NGOs by dividing into conflict types by acting subject and characteristic, and then analyzed the actual condition of conflict by dividing this into the righteousness of project, environmental destruction, collecting the public opinion, compensation issues and conflicts related to the overlapping and waste of the budget. In particular, in the examination by specialist, the examination of AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process) was conducted with three indexes by field and twelve detailed factors in order to measure the relative importance and priority about various conflicts that occur in the process of promotion of 'the revitalizing project of Geum River', and the pairwise comparison in which two elements are mutually compared at a time for each question was utilized. This was examined through e-mails since July 15th, 2010 through July 25th with members of city and county assemblies, NGOs, residents, specialists, the press and public servants in charge as the subject, and 40 copies among the total 85 copies were withdrawn(the rate of withdrawal of 47%) and all of them were used and the main results of the analysis are as follows. First, the relative importance and priority among the field of measurement indicators about conflict were in the order of the main cause of conflict between the government and residents, the main cause of conflict between governments and the main cause of conflict between the government and NGOs. Second, about the relative importance and priority among the field of 'measurement item' about conflict, 'the conflict that occurs due to the relative difference of gain and loss among local governments' was the most important in the conflict between governments, and 'the conflict that occurs due to the inactive consultation with residents' was the most important in the conflict between the government and residents, and 'the conflict that occurs due to the destruction of the ecosystem' was the most important in the conflict between the government and NGOs. Third, the relative importance and priority by measurement element of conflict between governments were in the order of the relative difference of gain and loss between local governments, the conflict over cost between the government and local governments, the inharmony of exercise of authority between governments and the overlapping and waste of the budget to promote the construction. Fourth, the relative importance and priority by measurement element of conflict between governments and residents were in the order of the conflict of the inactive consultation with residents, the controversy over compensation, the distribution of development profits and conflict and conflict over tackling the inconvenience of residents. Fifth, the relative importance and priority by measurement element of conflict between governments and NGOs were in the order of the destruction of the ecosystem, the controversy over the righteousness of the project, the loss of cultural assets and securing water resources. In this point of view, there are conflicts of 'the revitalizing project of Geum River' in relation to 'the value conflict' which is an original opposition to 'the revitalizing project of the four rivers' such

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론

Ⅱ. ｢금강살리기 사업｣과 갈등유형

Ⅲ. ｢금강살리기 사업｣의 갈등유형 분석

Ⅳ. ｢금강살리기 사업｣의 전문가 집단 AHP 조사분석 결과

Ⅴ. 정책적 시사점 및 결론적 논의

<참고문헌>

키워드

금강살리기사업(The revitalizing project of Geum River) 갈등유형(conflict type) 갈등구조분석(analysis of the structure of conflict) 소통과 합의형성(communication and making mutual agreement) 계층화분석법(Analytic Hierarchy Process)