표준특허를 둘러싼 법적 분쟁과 유럽과 미국의 판단 비교

• 영문명: A Recent Development on Standard Essential Patent in EU and the US
• 발행기관: 세창출판사
• 저자명: 이수진(Soo jin Lee)
• 간행물 정보: 『창작과 권리』2015년 겨울호 (제81호), 2~33쪽, 전체 32쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2015.12.30

영문 초록

There are decisions from CJEU and the US that provide the guidance on SEP licensing, which CJEU provide a specific framework with regard to the patent owner of SEP and the putative licensee who would like to reach a license agreement without breach of EU competitive law before any judicial measure and the US courts give an guidance to calculate the FRAND royalty based on amended Georgia-Pacific factors. While each decisions are derived from different judicial view, there are similarities and differences we should review carefully. And there are remaining issues to resolve in order to clarify the SEP licensing such as if FRAND declaration to the Standard Setting Organization(SSO) could be a operative agreement for the 3rd party beneficiary, how we can decide that the parties are willing to enter the license agreement, what is the good-faith obligation caused by the FRAND declaration and if the restraining the right of injunction by the patent owner based on the SEP for the 3rd party who have not contributed to the Standard in issue could be fair and reasonable.

목차

Ⅰ. 유럽과 미국에서의 표준특허를 둘러싼 분쟁

Ⅱ. EU의 최근 동향

Ⅲ. 미국의 최근 동향

Ⅳ. EU와 미국의 판단 비교

Ⅴ. 향후의 과제

【참고문헌】

Abstract

키워드

표준특허 FRAND 라이선스 금지청구 유럽사법재판소 로열티 산정 조지아퍼시픽 요소 SEP(Standard Essential Patents) FRAND(Fair Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory) CJEU Injunction eBay factors FRAND royalty Georgia-Pacific factors