본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

특별사면과 재심

이용수 91

영문명
발행기관
한국형사정책학회
저자명
권창국
간행물 정보
『형사정책』刑事政策 第27卷 第2號, 191~213쪽, 전체 23쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2015.08.30
5,560

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Recently, the supreme court of Korea modified existing case law which can not permit retrial of the cases specially pardoned that extinguished effect of conviction, because there is no final judgement of guilty as the object of retrial. furthermore, unlike the general pardon case that extinguished the right of accusation, the retrial court has to close the case by judgement of guilt or not, not by acquittal.in the view that in the case specially pardoned that extinguish effect of conviction, retrial can not be permitted, the judgement of guilty has a part for decision in relation to the facts constituting crime and a part of sentence in relation to punitive action, and these parts can not be divisible. so if the effect of sentencing by special pardon, the effect of other part(guilty decision about the facts constituting crime) is to be extinguished, too. therefore, eventually the object case for retrial(irrevocable judgement of guilt) as a whole can not exist. this view is the basic logic in the past Japanese lower court case law, and the existing case law of supreme court of Korea also present the conclusion,not permitting retial about the cases specially pardoned that the effect of conviction is to be extinguished, based on above Japanese case law and logic. but the effect of special pardon is restricted to the extinguishing effect of sentencing in future, so the fact and historical effect that the accused had been guilty is never changed by special pardon. therefore, in isolation from validity of the view about separability of judgement of guilty, the accused specially pardoned has a actual profit that remove all effects of the judgement of guilty by retrial, permanently. there is significant meaning in recent case law of the supreme court of Korea, by making sure this point.

목차

대상판결
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 특별사면의 효과로서 ‘형 선고의 효력상실’의 의미
Ⅲ. 형 선고의 효력이 상실되는 특별사면사건 대한 재심개시
Ⅳ. 재심공판절차 : 면소판결인가,아니면 유・무죄의 실체재판인가?
Ⅴ. 맺음말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

권창국. (2015).특별사면과 재심. 형사정책, 27 (2), 191-213

MLA

권창국. "특별사면과 재심." 형사정책, 27.2(2015): 191-213

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제