본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

선박 충돌시 조치의무의 범위와 몇 가지 문제점

이용수 29

영문명
발행기관
한국형사정책학회
저자명
김태수
간행물 정보
『형사정책』刑事政策 第27卷 第2號, 147~164쪽, 전체 18쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2015.08.30
4,960

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

In case of ship collision, spontaneous reaction is difficult due to weather of the collision site, equipment, etc., which poses struggle in rescuing human and material resources and may lead to a catastrophe.Therefore, in the Seafarer’s act, certain responsibilities are imposed on captain and if violated, criminal punishment is applied. But duty to action in ship collision stated in the Seafarer’s act has complications as following. First, to fulfill the duty to action, ships must collide and it is applied only when the ‘ships’ are under the Seafarer’s act. Therefore, in collision between a ship under the Seafarer’s act and another that is not, this clause doesn’t apply, which is irrational in promoting safety of life and body. Second, imposing duty to action on those who are not responsible for the collision can be conceded in regards of social solidarity and risk allocation. But setting method of restriction in case of violation as punishment can be incoherent with the principle of responsibility which states no punishment if not responsible. Third,despite the fact that size of reproach when not performing duty to action after creating ship collision on intention is different from when not performing duty to action after creating ship collision due to negligence, pronouncing both cases with same statuary punishment is unjust. Fourth, in ship collision, necessary measures should be taken in saving lives and ship. But as necessary measures have danger to oppose the principle of clarity and can be understood arbitrarily, it should be understood in benefit of the criminal law. Benefit of the criminal law should be seen as individual legal interest and in regards of safety of life and ship in ship collision and within such benefit of the criminal law, necessary duty to action should be established.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. ‘선박의 서로 충돌’의 의미
Ⅲ. 조치의무자
Ⅳ. 필요한 조치의무
Ⅴ. 맺음말

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김태수. (2015).선박 충돌시 조치의무의 범위와 몇 가지 문제점. 형사정책, 27 (2), 147-164

MLA

김태수. "선박 충돌시 조치의무의 범위와 몇 가지 문제점." 형사정책, 27.2(2015): 147-164

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제