본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

양형정보시스템에 관한 비교법 연구

이용수 47

영문명
발행기관
한국형사정책학회
저자명
박형관
간행물 정보
『형사정책』刑事政策 第27卷 第2號, 7~36쪽, 전체 30쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2015.08.30
6,400

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Korea has implemented various efforts to reduce deep rooted sentencing problems of which ‘Jeon-Kwan-Je-woo’ and unwarranted disparities have proven to be most glaring. As part of this effort a sentencing commission was established and an advisory sentencing guidelines system was introduced. However, because merely enhancing consistency in sentencing would by and large undermine individuality, a well functioning sentencing information system(‘SIS’) would be advantageous to achieving objectivity while preserving individuality in sentencing. A successful SIS can analyze the sentencing guidelines's implementation results in a positive way and assist in the sentencing guidelines system. Furthermore, the SIS will be pivotal in restoring public trust to the criminal justice system by providing easy access to sentencing information for the people. Thus far the Korean Sentencing Commission(‘KSC’) does not operate an independent SIS but it would be in the interest of our nation to launch a SIS after observing the SIS operating experiences of other countries in order to find a model best suited for us. In the jurisdictions that have successfully implemented a SIS, each sentencing commission maintains a good scheme in which it collects and analyzes qualified sentencing data and provides sentencing information for the many users. Globally,providing sentencing information not only for judges but also for public is increasingly becoming the norm. KSC also collects and analyzes the sentencing data but the scope of its activities in collecting, analyzing and disclosing information remains limited. Further, because of the lack of evidence-based analyses it is difficult to discern if any alleviation of the aforementioned sentencing problems have been resolved. Now the KSC receives qualified data from the judges directly and develops good sentencing database. Through a newly established SIS, the KSC can analyze data thoroughly and disclose sentencing information on a broad scale. By ensuring public access to sentencing information can faith in the criminal justice system be restored.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 우리 양형위원회의 양형자료 수집,분석 및 양형정보 공개 방식
Ⅲ. 주요 국가들의 양형정보시스템 구축 및 운용 현황
Ⅳ. 우리나라 양형정보시스템 구축 및 운용에 관한 제언
Ⅴ. 결론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박형관. (2015).양형정보시스템에 관한 비교법 연구. 형사정책, 27 (2), 7-36

MLA

박형관. "양형정보시스템에 관한 비교법 연구." 형사정책, 27.2(2015): 7-36

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제