통합된 두 눈 시야와 한 눈 시야의 Mean Deviation 비교

• 영문명: Comparison of Mean Deviation Between Integrated Binocular Visual Field and Monocular Visual Field
• 발행기관: 대한안과학회
• 저자명: 전연숙 박인기,Yeoun Sook Chun, MD, PhD, In Ki Park, MD, PhD
• 간행물 정보: 『대한안과학회지』Ophthalmological Society,volume54,number6, 919~926쪽, 전체 8쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 기타의약학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.06.15

영문 초록

Purpose: To compare the mean deviation (MD) between monocular and integrated binocular visual field (BVF). Methods: Thirty-six patients with glaucoma in at least 1 eye were recruited for the present study. Seventy-two threshold sensitivities of the BVF were obtained without additional visual field test by the Best Location and Binocular Summation methods using the 2 monocular visual fields of central 30o. The MD of the BVF was obtained by comparison to the value distribution in the age-matched population with normal BVF. After defining the better eye with the better MD value from the 2 eyes, comparison of the MDs between individual eyes and the integrated BVF were assessed. In addition, the MDs between the integrated BVF and actual BVF were compared in 11 patients. Results: In patients with a mean age of 58.7 years, the MD of the better eye was -2.3 dB, and the worse eye was -4.9 dB (p < 0.01). There was a significant difference between the 2 MDs derived from Best Location and Binocular Summation (-1.7 and -2.0 dB, respectively p = 0.045). The MDs according to BVF more improved than the better eye (p < 0.01 for both). There was no significant difference in MDs between integrated BVF and actual BVF (-1.9 vs -2.0, -2.3 vs -2.0, respectively p > 0.1). Conclusions: The integrated BVF more improved than the better eye. When providing guidance to glaucoma patients regarding therapeutic decisions considering the MD of IVF may be important.

키워드

Glaucoma, Integrated binocular visual field, Mean deviation