공소장변경의 필요성판단

• 영문명: Determining the need for modification of an indictment
• 발행기관: 원광대학교 법학연구소
• 저자명: 이존걸(Lee John Girl)
• 간행물 정보: 『원광법학』제30권 제2호, 177~196쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2014.06.30

영문 초록

This paper is about the judgment of determining the need for modification of an indictment theories and the criteria for the judgment of determining the need for modification for studied. Truth discovery and substantive modification of an indictment the authority to impose penalties the country, and at the same time to enable proper exercise of the accused can guarantee defense of the rights institution. Thus, the court can modification of modification of reason modification of an indictment occurs, the public prosecutor require. The public prosecutor must apply for modification of an indictment. An indictment should be changed in any case for the opposition to have a different theory. Most importantly, the public prosecutor receive an indictment want to judge described the defendant appeals the fact itself. In this sense, the theory is reasonable to mention the fact. Supreme Court follows this theory. In fact, according to the change of these claims, and the fact that the defendant's defense of the changes result in a substantial penalty if the concern is that should the need modification of an indictment.

목차

Ⅰ. 머리말

Ⅱ. 공소장변경의 필요성판단에 관한 학설

Ⅲ. 공소장변경의 필요성판단에 관한 판례

Ⅳ. 맺는 말

참고문헌

키워드

공소장 공소장변경 공소사실 심판대상 불고불리 indictment modification of an indictment count objective judgment nemo iudex sine actore