본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

중요참고인 출석의무제도에 대한 비판적 고찰과 참고인진술 확보방안의 제안

이용수 65

영문명
A Critical Consideration on Compelling a Material Witness to Attend and Testify, and Proposals for Securing a Witness Statement and Cooperation
발행기관
한국형사정책학회
저자명
이희경(Lee, Hee Kyung)
간행물 정보
『형사정책』刑事政策 第26卷 第2號, 197~222쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2014.08.31
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The testimony of a material witness in criminal investigation plays an important role in determining the facts of a crime, proving guilt, and securing objective evidence. However, witness investigation depends on voluntary cooperation, leaving an investigative agency with no means to compel a witness’s presence and statement if a witness refused to cooperate. The Korean Department of Justice, in a 2010 pre-announcement of legislation, attempted to provide for this ability to compel the attendance of material witnesses. However, this bill never became law due to opposition stating that the bill violated the principle of voluntary cooperation and violated the rights of witnesses. However, the adoption of material witness compulsion remains an issue that may be reignited at any time for the cause of discovering substantive truth and processing cases in a timely manner. This paper therefore critically considers the arrest of material witness provisions in the Justice Department’s amendment bill. No doubt the Justice Department’s attempts to adopt legal means to compel the attendance of material witnesses is due to its usefulness for the discovery of substantive truth, in addition to preexisting means to secure witness testimony such as evidence preservation and application to examine witnesses. However, the solution contemplated by the Justice Department violates the principle of voluntary cooperation, and also the principle of due process pertaining to the suspect’s or defendant’s right to defense. Some call for adopting this compulsion of witnesses based on laws adopted by foreign jurisdictions, but these countries differ from Korea in their investigative environments, judicial systems, and the stature and authority of investigative agencies. The better alternative, therefore, is to raise the effectiveness of evidence preservation and applications to examine witnesses. In order to efficiently secure witness statements, the witness’s personal security must be guaranteed, measures must be taken so witnesses may be summoned and enter appearances conveniently, cost recompense made realistic through means such as day wages, and public consciousness raised through publicity and education so that witnesses will voluntarily cooperate with investigations.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 참고인진술확보의 필요성
Ⅲ. 법무부 개정안의 중요참고인 출석의무제도
Ⅳ. 중요참고인 출석의무제도에 대한 비판적 고찰
Ⅴ. 효율적인 참고인진술 확보방안의 제안
Ⅵ. 글을 나가며
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이희경(Lee, Hee Kyung). (2014).중요참고인 출석의무제도에 대한 비판적 고찰과 참고인진술 확보방안의 제안. 형사정책, 26 (2), 197-222

MLA

이희경(Lee, Hee Kyung). "중요참고인 출석의무제도에 대한 비판적 고찰과 참고인진술 확보방안의 제안." 형사정책, 26.2(2014): 197-222

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제