『脈經』ㆍ『脈訣』ㆍ『脈訣刊誤』의 비교를 통한 『脈訣』의 脈象에 대한 硏究

• 영문명: Study on the definitions of pulses of 『Maekgyeol(脈訣)』 by comparison of 『Maekgyung(脈經)』 and 『Maekgyeol(脈訣)』 and 『Maekgyeolganoh(脈訣刊誤)』
• 발행기관: 대한한의학원전학회
• 저자명: ChungChiwook(鄭致旭) YoonChangyeol(尹暢烈)
• 간행물 정보: 『대한한의학원전학회지』23권 5호, 103~116쪽, 전체 13쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 한의학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.09.25

영문 초록

『Maekgyung(脈經)』 was the first book for diagnostic method in traditional Chinese medicine history, but it couldn't be spreaded widely. After that, 『Maekgyeol(脈訣)』 was widely spreaded for centuries, because it was more concise and easier to memorize than 『Maekgyung』. But as time went by, people got to know that 『Maekgyeol』 had many errors. After 『Maekgyeolganoh(脈訣刊誤)』 corrected the errors of 『Maekgyeol』, 『Maekgyeol』 came to lose its reputation and people began to study 『Binhomaekhak(瀕湖脈學)』 instead of 『Maekgyeol』. We got to wonder why 『Maekgyeol』 was criticized by many people, so we decided to compare the definitions of pulses(脈象) in 『Maekgyung』 and 『Maekgyeol』 and 『Maekgyeolganoh』. Both 『Maekgyung』 and 『Maekgyeol』 have 24 kinds of pulses, but 22 kinds are in common. In 22 kinds of pulses, only 2 kinds of definitions are similar and the others are different. And 『Maekgyeolganoh』 criticized errors of 『Maekgyeol』 and corrected the definitions by that of 『Maekgyung』. In conclusion, we come to know that 『Maekgyeol』 was rejected by people because it defined most of pulses different from 『Maekgyung』.

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 序論

Ⅱ. 本論

Ⅲ. 結論

Ⅳ. 參考文獻

키워드

『Maekgyung』 『Maekgyeol』 『Maekgyeolganoh』 definitions of pulses 脈經 脈訣 脈訣刊誤 脈象