학술논문
친고죄와 반의사불벌죄의 근거와 현행법제의 타당성 연구
이용수 628
- 영문명
- A Study on the Bases of Indictment Subject to Complaint and Penalty Subject to Consent, and the Justifiability of the Current Law
- 발행기관
- 한국피해자학회
- 저자명
- 이희경(Lee Hee-Kyung)
- 간행물 정보
- 『피해자학연구』제21권 제1호, 265~291쪽, 전체 26쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2013.06.30
5,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
Most countries’ criminal systems operate under the principle of the state’s exclusive power over criminal procedure, where the state will exercise its powers of criminal procedure regardless of the victim’s opinion. The rationale is that the public interest in the fair and consistent exercise of the state’s criminal penalty power to indict every crime. However, the Korean Criminal Act and certain special Acts provide for indictment subject to complaint and penalty subject to consent, which serve as exceptions to or limitations on the principle of the state’s exclusive power over criminal procedure.
Under the current law, making the indictment of a crime subject to complaint is a matter of legislative policy where its rationality is recognized so long as the public interest in imposing penalties upon crimes is greater than the interest in restraining the criminal penalty power by leaving the choice for its exercise to the person entitled to file a complaint. On this basis, different crimes may have different reasons to have their indictment made subject to complaint. Namely, making indictment subject to complaint is based on varied criminal-policy considerations.
Based on the rationale behind such indictment subject to complaint and penalty subject to consent provisions, this paper has reviewed these previsions in the current Criminal Act, Act on Special Cases Concerning the Punishment, Etc., of Sexual Crimes, Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles from Sexual Abuse, and Copyright Act. Though the Criminal Act and related special Acts made indictment of certain sexually violent crimes subject to complaint to prevent infringement on the victim’s reputation or privacy due to the crime becoming public, there have been arguments that the provision serves more to indemnify sexually violent criminals from punishment rather than to protect victims, voiding both the general and specific deterrent effect of criminal law and encouraging recidivism. Based on such arguments the amendment of the Criminal Act and related special Acts in December 2012 removed provisions making indictment of sexual crimes such as rape subject to victim complaint.
Furthermore, affected by the conclusion of the Korea-U.S. FTA, the Copyright Act was amended in 2008 to decrease the scope of crimes whose indictment is subject to complaint. Afterward, through two additional amendments the Copyright Act added new obligatory provisions and made according changes in the penalty provisions. Though some commentators criticize the remaining crimes in the Copyright Act whose indictment is subject to complaint, copyright materials are not exclusively subject to copyright holders’ rights. They have a public goods component in that the general public effect changes in ideas and opinions by using others’ works and fuel new works by such use, making such works and their usage the source of development in human culture. Therefore it is justifiable to make the indictment and punishment of copyright violations subject to the copyright holders’ complaint.
Meanwhile, the bill for the partial amendment of the Criminal Act submitted by Assembly Member Park Yeong-seon and ten others on June 12, 2012 proposed amending Article 312 to make the indictment of all crimes against reputation subject to complaint so that these crimes would not be used for political purposes by politically motivated prosecutors. Considering the reality of investigative practice, where investigation on the crime of libel, also listed as a crime whose penalty is subject to complaint, only commences on the complaint of an individual entitled to file a complaint such as the victim, the amendment bill is justified in making the indictment of all crimes against reputation subject to criminal complaint.
목차
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 친고죄와 반의사불벌죄의 근거
Ⅲ. 현행법상 친고죄와 반의사불벌죄 규정
Ⅳ. 외국형법상 친고죄 규정
Ⅴ. 현행법상 친고죄와 반의사불벌죄의 타당성 검토
Ⅵ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 친고죄와 반의사불벌죄의 근거와 현행법제의 타당성 연구
- 미국 증인보호제도를 통한 특정범죄신고자 등 보호법의 재조명
- 성범죄 피해 아동의 기억력 및 증언 능력에 대한 일반인들의 인식
- 성범죄 피해자의 관점에서 친고죄와 반의사불벌죄의 형사정책적 의미에 관한 연구
- 범죄피해자보상제도에 관한 비판적 고찰
- 산업재해 사망 피해의 형사 규제 방향
- 범죄피해, 범죄의 두려움과 청소년의 삶의 질
- 양형절차에서 피해자 진술권의 역할
- 제2차 피해자화와 관련한 독일의 최근 논의의 시사
- 기회이론을 활용한 학교폭력 피해요인 분석
- 경찰관의 범죄피해자 인권보호 의식에 관한 연구
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!