본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

상표권 남용 법리의 재고찰

이용수 159

영문명
The Rethinking on the Principle of Trademark Misuse
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
손호진(Son, Ho-Jin)
간행물 정보
『과학기술과 법』제4권 제1호, 31~61쪽, 전체 30쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2013.06.30
6,400

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

It is specified that Korean Trademark Act completes the appeal-for-invalidation procedure of the trademark registration prepared independently when a registered trademark corresponds to a fixed reason, and can repeal the registration. Therefore, a trademark is not invalid if the trial decision of repealing by such judge of Korean Intellectual Property Tribunal does not become final and conclusive, although there are registration grounds for invalidation even if, since it was registered for a while. However, if the trademark which can not satisfy regulation of Trademark Act about trademark registration, and can not obtain registration is wrong, and is registered as a trademark, or it is after trademark registration and registration grounds for invalidation occur, only the trademark registration is only maintained formally. By the way, it not only damages unfairly monopoly and the public interest relevant to use of 'trademark if it enables it to use exclusively without special restriction of a trademark right, but it is arranged at the purpose of Trademark Act. Moreover, you have to use so that a trademark right may also suit the above one definition of private property rights. therefore, the trademark holder use a trademark being formally registered as a trademark, although there is no value clear trademark registration invalid and protected legally injunction on infringement or, Enabling it to charge reparations etc. gives a trademark holder unjust profits, and it only inflicts an irrational pain and damage on the person using the trademark. Therefore, you have to conclude that the Article 2 abuse-of-right prohibition provision of Civil Code can deny the effect of such an opinion. However, it has a problem that the court which takes charge of an infringement litigation without completing the procedure of an appeal for invalidation for the judgment about the registration invalidity of the trademark registered through examination of the Patent Office does psychology and judgment of to the invalid existence of trademark registration. Therefore, it must be prudent at the point that there may be an arbitrary interpretation of the court which disregarded the current law system.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 상표권 남용의 의의와 성립요건
Ⅲ. 상표권 남용의 유형
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

손호진(Son, Ho-Jin). (2013).상표권 남용 법리의 재고찰. 과학기술과 법, 4 (1), 31-61

MLA

손호진(Son, Ho-Jin). "상표권 남용 법리의 재고찰." 과학기술과 법, 4.1(2013): 31-61

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제