신용장거래에서 거절통지의 형식적 요건에 관한 연구

• 영문명: An Analysis on the Formality of refusal ill Documentary Letter of Credit
• 발행기관: 한국무역연구원
• 저자명: 김철수(Choel-Soo Kim)
• 간행물 정보: 『무역연구』제9권 제6호, 617~637쪽, 전체 21쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.11.30

영문 초록

The significant changes to the refusal procedure introduced by art.16 of UCP 600 may have a considerable impact on the substantive entitlements of bankers. Compliance with the new formalities of a "single notice" comprising a "statement of refusal" leads little scope for implication in the interpretation of communications issued by bankers pursuant to art. 16. The increased formality is likely to result in unequivocal notices of refusal being rendered defective as against the refusing banks without them having any scope to supplement a defective notice by subsequent communications. The absence of any settled international practice in regard to the time allowed to return documents will continue to create uncertainty. Perhaps this is an area that might usefully be the subject of some definitive guidance in the future to promote certainty and fairness, particularly since the times for examining documents, giving a refusal notice and returning documents.

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 신용장거래에서 거절통지의 요건

Ⅲ. 제시서류의 거절통지절차에 따른 쟁점

Ⅳ. 거절통지에 관한 형시적인 절차의 적법성

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

Letter of Credit Formality Refusal of Presentation Resonable Promptness UCP 600 Article 16