신용장 양도은행의 법적 지위에 관한 연구

• 영문명: A Study on Legal Status of the Transferring Bank under UCP600
• 발행기관: 한국무역연구원
• 저자명: 박세운(Sae Woon Park)
• 간행물 정보: 『무역연구』제9권 제6호, 89~109쪽, 전체 21쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2013.11.30

영문 초록

Even where a letter of credit is expressed to be transferable, it does not follow that the first beneficiary is entitled to require that the credit be transferred. Banks do not regard themselves as being obligated to effect a transfer. UCP 600 stipulates that even the issuing bank or the confirming bank is under no obligation to transfer a credit except to the extent and in the manner expressly consented to by that bank. However, U.C.C does not permit the issuing bank or the confirming bank to arbitrarily refuse a request to transfer. The Chinese court ruled that where a transferring bank effects a transfer but omits a required documents, it faces liability if the omission causes failure to present a document that is the basis for the issuing bank to refuse the presentation. Therefore, the transferring bank should be careful not to advise the original credit otherwise. The transferring bank should also check whether the second beneficiary who is abroad is the party subject to sanction or not.

목차

Abstract

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 신용장 양도의 개요

Ⅲ. 양도은행의 정의와 법률관계

Ⅳ. 양도은행의 실무상 유의점

Ⅴ. 결론

참고문헌

키워드

Transferring Bank UCP600 Transferable L/C