Econia - Measures Affecting Imports of Passenger Cars

• 발행기관: 전북대학교 법학전문대학원 학술지 편집위원회
• 저자명: 조하늘 서유창 양재석 윤지은
• 간행물 정보: 『JEONBUK LAW JOURNAL』JEONBUK LAW JOURNAL 창간호, 115~149쪽, 전체 35쪽
• 주제분류: 법학 > 법학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2010.08.31

목차

Ⅰ. INTRODUCTION

Ⅱ. SUMMARY OF CLAIMS AND ARGUMENTS

Ⅲ. ECONIA’S CARBON TAX SYSTEM IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE Ⅰ: 1 OF THE GATT 1994

Ⅳ. ECONIA’S CARBON TAX SYSTEM IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE Ⅱ: 1(A) AND (B) OF THE GATT 1994

Ⅴ. ECONIA’S CARBON TAX SYSTEM IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE Ⅲ : 2 OF THE GATT 1994

Ⅵ. ECONIA’S “POLLUTANT TAX” IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE Ⅲ : 2 FIRST SENTENCE OF THE GATT 1994

Ⅶ. ECONIA’S “POLLUTANT TAX” IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLEⅢ : 2, SECOND SENTENCE OF THE GATT 1994

Ⅷ. ECONIA’S “POLLUTANT TAX” IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE I OF THE GATT 1994

Ⅸ. ECONIA’S TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE 5 IN THE SCM AGREEMENT

Ⅹ. ECONIA’S PLATE LABELING IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE 2.1 AND ARTICLE 3.4 IN THE TBT AGREEMENT

Ⅺ. ECONIA’S PLATE LABELING IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE I : 1 AND ARTICLE Ⅲ : 4 OF THE GATT 1994

Ⅻ. ECONIA’S FREE PARKING PERMIT IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE 3.1(B) AND ARTICLE 3.2 OF SCM AGREEMENT

ⅩⅢ. ECONIA’S FREE PARKING PERMIT IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE Ⅰ: 1 AND ARTICLE Ⅲ : 4 OF THE GATT 1994

ⅩⅣ. ECONIA’S RELINQUISHMENT OF TAXES APPLICABLE TO BLUTICA IS INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE Ⅰ: 1 AND ARTICLE ⅩⅩⅣ : 8 (B) OF THE GATT 1994

ⅩⅤ. ELIMINATION OF 8% AD VALOREM TARIFF AND THE EXEMPTION OF POLLUTANT TAX ON IMPORTS FROM BLUTICA ARE INCONSIST WITH ARTICLE Ⅰ: 1 OF THE GATT 1994, NOT JUSTIFIED BY ENABLING CLAUSE

ⅩⅥ. ECONIA’S MEASURES ARE INCONSISTENT WITH ARTICLE ⅩⅩ (B) OF THE GATT 1994

ⅩⅦ. EACH MEASURE OF ECONIA NULLIFIES OR IMPAIRES BENEFITS WITHIN THE MEANING OF ARTICLE ⅩⅩⅢ : 1(B) OF THE GATT 1994

ⅩⅧ. CONCLUSION