The Comparison of Clinical Assessment Tools for the Foot Posture

• 발행기관: 한국전문물리치료학회
• 저자명: Jin-yi Lee Jong-duk Choi
• 간행물 정보: 『한국전문물리치료학회지』한국전문물리치료학회지 제19권 제3호, 115~123쪽, 전체 9쪽
• 주제분류: 의약학 > 의학일반
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2012.09.30

영문 초록

It is important to assess foot posture when investigating the relationship between lower extremity dysfunctions and foot types. Although several measurements of static foot posture have been used, there is no consensus regarding clinical measurements for foot posture. The aim of this study is to explore the differences among navicular drift (NDt), foot posture index (FPI), arch index (AI), dorsal arch height ratio (DAHR), normal navicular height truncated (NNHt) and to discover the most effective measurement. After foot types were classified by navicular drop test (NDp), clinical measurements of NDt, FPI, AI, DAHR, and NNHt were performed on 64 subjects’ feet. ANOVA analysis was used for the variance of the difference between the NDp and the five kinds of clinical measurements, and the level of significance was set at a=.05. The results showed that all five clinical measurements demonstrated significant differences with navicular drop. In post-hoc, FPI and NNHt showed significant differences in all foot types. The five clinical measurements are suitable the classification of foot types through the NDp. Therefore, it could be possible to assess correct and objective foot posture by using FPI and NNHt.

목차

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

References

키워드

Assessment tool Foot posture Pronated foot Supinated foot