본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

Responsiveness Comparisons of Self-Report Versus Therapist-Scored Functional Capacity for Workers With Low Back Pain

이용수 0

영문명
발행기관
한국전문물리치료학회
저자명
Bongsam Choi So-yeon Park
간행물 정보
『한국전문물리치료학회지』한국전문물리치료학회지 제19권 제3호, 91~97쪽, 전체 7쪽
주제분류
의약학 > 의학일반
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.09.30
4,000

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The primary aim of this study was to compare responsiveness of self-report by worker and therapist-scored functional capacity instrument. Self-report and therapist-scored interval-level person measures and item difficulties were compared at admission and discharge. Therapist and worker ratings were collected on 230 clients from 27 rehabilitation sites using the newly developed Occupational Rehabilitation Data Base (ORDB) functional capacity instrument. ORDB comprises several subscales measuring relevant variables of “a return-to-work model" in work-related rehabilitation clinics. The functional capacity scale deals with 10 DOT job factors. The rating scale categories were 1-severely impaired, 2-moderately impaired, 3-mildly impaired, and 4 -not impaired. Only data from clients with low back pain (n=98) with complete data (both admission and discharge scores) were used for the present study. Therapists and workers completed the functional capacity instrument at admission and discharge. Rasch analysis [1-parameter item response theory model (IRT)] was applied to calibrate item difficulty and person ability measure of therapist and workers ratings. Effect sizes for therapist and self-report ratings were slightly different, .69 and .30, respectively. Therapist and worker ratings were more consistent at discharge (r=.54) than at admission (r=.32). Workers have a tendency to be more severe in their ratings (show higher item difficulties) than therapists at admission and discharge. Therapists and workers report similar magnitudes of improvement following treatment program These findings challenge the belief that injured workers may unreliable source for monitoring therapeutic outcomes. Self-report measures have the advantage of conserving therapist time for treatment (versus evaluation). While the therapist and self-report ratings are comparable at discharge, there is less consistency at admission. Comparable therapist-worker ratings may be achieved by controlling for rating severity using IRT methodologies.

목차

Abstract
Introduction
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
References

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

Bongsam Choi,So-yeon Park. (2012).Responsiveness Comparisons of Self-Report Versus Therapist-Scored Functional Capacity for Workers With Low Back Pain. 한국전문물리치료학회지, 19 (3), 91-97

MLA

Bongsam Choi,So-yeon Park. "Responsiveness Comparisons of Self-Report Versus Therapist-Scored Functional Capacity for Workers With Low Back Pain." 한국전문물리치료학회지, 19.3(2012): 91-97

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제