본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

동북아의 평화와 조일교섭

이용수 25

영문명
Peace in the Northeast Asia, and the Diplomatic Negotiations between North Korea and Japan
발행기관
국제고려학회 서울지회
저자명
정태헌(Jeong, Tae-heon)
간행물 정보
『국제고려학회 서울지회 논문집』제7호, 67~91쪽, 전체 25쪽
주제분류
인문학 > 기타인문학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2006.06.30
5,800

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

A hundred years ago, the Daehan Empire failed to bring proper reforms to the country, and also lost the capability to effectively mediate the Western powers which had clashing interests in this region. Therefore, the Daehan empire was forced to face a distinct possibiliry of losing its own sovereignty. China also, became the battleground for the Imperialist Western powers for the duration of the early half of the 20th century. Japan, on the other hand, successfully went through the Myeongchi Yushin reforms, and based upon the Denno Imperial Administration, Japan became an empire itself. Then it chose to resort to blatant invasions of nearby areas, which did help Japan solve its own internal problems. The current situation of the Northeast Asian region did not much change at all, compared to the situation we contemplated above. Since the end of the war, Japan has failed to properly and successfully resolve its own dark past, which is tainted with unwarranted invasions. On the contrary, an ultra right-wing conservatism is flourishing everywhere in Japan, and with the ‘generous’ help from the U.S., it still dreams of becoming the dominant nation in Asia, albeit such domination would not be possible without U.S. support of Japan. China is no exception, as it also dreams to restore the Sino-centric regional order to the Northeast Asia, based upon its economic development which has progressed since the birth of China’s reformation and ‘opening-up-the-nation’ policy. Yet there are also some differences. First, the potential threat to U.S. and Japan is not considered to be Russia, which has unfortunately inherited the aftermath of the U.S.S.R.’s collapse, anymore. lt is now China. Second, unlike hundred years ago, today the Korean peninsula is sustaining two divided countries caught in the paradigm which could be described as ‘Land-based power vs Maritime-based power’. And these two entities are still exchanging hostilities and threats. Third, which could be considered as the most definitive difference between now and the past, U.S.’s pursuit for dominancy based upon the capital interests of the military munitions manufacturers is now not only threatening the peace of the Northeast Asian region but also peace of the entire world. Unlike the situation of hundred years ago, in which Western Imperialist powers were checking each other in a sort of ‘status-quo of power’ status, U.S. is now enjoying its position as the single most influential super power in the world. Since the Cold war was ended, U.S. has displayed a series of foreign policies that were designed to establish a national security crisis situation domestically by establishing a ‘devil in the dream’ scenario, and also designed to continuously wage wars dictared by the interests of the military munitions manufacturers and the oil companies. The phenomenon of ever-strengthening right-wing conservatism which has been considered to be a problem since the 1990s is by itself a demonstration of a problem which had not been resolved by either U.S. or Japan due to their own internal problems and instead simply buried in the aftermath of the war Examination of the Japanese society and the process of negotiations between North Korea and Japan, which had continued since the Japanese defeat in 1945 and through the 1980s, reveals that there were no notable results coming out of the negotiations in the early stages because of Japan’s not so forthcoming attitude in negotiating with North Korea, and the also passive and negative attitude coming from both North Korea and the U.S.. But in the late 1980s, Japan turned to conduct active negotiations with North Korea, in order to amplify its own influence as the master of the ‘Bubble Economy’, and in 1990 established the ‘Joint Proclamation of the Three Parties’.

목차

1. 21세기 동북아와 한(조선)반도의 암운
2. 패전 후 1980년대까지의 일본 사회와 북일교섭 과정
3. 1990년대 이후 일본 우경화 특징과 조일정상회담의 난항

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

정태헌(Jeong, Tae-heon). (2006).동북아의 평화와 조일교섭. 국제고려학회 서울지회 논문집, (7), 67-91

MLA

정태헌(Jeong, Tae-heon). "동북아의 평화와 조일교섭." 국제고려학회 서울지회 논문집, .7(2006): 67-91

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제