金台俊 『朝鮮漢文學史』와 魯迅 『漢文學史網要』의 文字 問題

• 영문명: The Problem of Cino Character in the New Formation of Literature-The Comparative Study on Kim Tae-Jun and Lu Xun
• 발행기관: 국제고려학회 서울지회
• 저자명: 류준필(Ryu, Jun-pill)
• 간행물 정보: 『국제고려학회 서울지회 논문집』제1호, 341~359쪽, 전체 19쪽
• 주제분류: 인문학 > 기타인문학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1999.06.30

영문 초록

Kim Tae-Jun’s The History of Cino Character Writings in Korea(『朝鮮漢文學史』) is the first book which investigates the long history of cino character writings, but its evaluation of cino character is strongly negative. Kim suggested that only the writings in Korean letters deserve the name of Korean literature, then repudiated the cino character writings as alien to the common life of Koreans. However, Kim never took the inner criterria of ‘literature’ itself. Kim’s case is the problematic one in the contrast to Lu Xun, a Chinese novelist and critic. Lu Xun wrote the Brief on the History of Chinese Literature(『漢文學史網要』), and gave attention to the mutation of letters, but his interests was in the distiction of the spoken/ the written, and of literary language/everyday language. In the comparison with Lu Xun, Kim’s literary history means the under or the supra status of literature.

목차

1. 序論

2. 金台俊의 한문문학 배제의 논리

3. 魯迅 『漢文學史網要』의 문자ㆍ문학관

4. 金台俊의 한문문학 배제 논리 비판 : 魯迅 『漢文學史網要』와의 비교

5. 結論

키워드

한문학 국민문학 김태준 노신 문자 문학언어