본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

200해리 이원 대륙붕 제도의 두 가지 쟁점

이용수 510

영문명
Two legal issues concerning the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles
발행기관
국제법평론회
저자명
김현정(KIM, Hyun Jung)
간행물 정보
『국제법평론』제35호, 113~143쪽, 전체 31쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2012.04.30
6,520

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The continental shelf can extend, only as the natural prolongation of a land territory, beyond 200 nautical miles in accordance with the article 76 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (LOS Convention). For that reason, the Convention establishes a complex procedural mechanism where an international institution, Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf (CLCS), intervenes in determining the outer limits of this extended continental shelf. Given that a number of States have currently presented submissions to the CLCS, this paper addresses two legal issues concerning the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles: Firstly, the research points out some uncertainties of the article 76 of the LOS Convention, including the resulting difficulties associated with its application. Actually, the legal nature of the extended continental shelf is controversial, whereas the role of the CLCS is too ambiguous to achieve the purpose which the mechanism for establishment of the outer limits intends in the context of the article 76 §8 of the Convention. Additionally, one faces a series of unpredicted practical difficulties in applying this provision; for example, the CLCS suffers from the heavy workload, whereas it is expected that various types of disputes among the CLCS, the requesting State, the latter and the third State will be mushrooming. Secondly, the LOS Convention does not pay enough attention to the consequences that the extended continental shelf claim would cause to the regime of the high seas. Simultaneously, States are interested only in extending their jurisdiction in the maritime area beyond 200 nautical miles. The national legislation of some States that have presented submissions or preliminary information to the CLCS could have impact on the freedom of other States on the waters superjacent to the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles. The research, addressing these two issues, finds the unilateralism of coastal States which utilize the ambiguity found in the provisions of the LOS Convention regarding the extended continental shelf. On the other hand, the paper infers that this unilateralism may compromise the principle of freedom of the high seas. Nevertheless, this does not mean that such unilateral behaviors of States necessarily lead to the formation of a new international customary rule. Instead, the paper argues that it might be at present more appropriate to consider such a kind of behavior as a noncompliance with existing rules of the law of the sea.

목차

Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 200해리 이원 대륙붕 외측한계 확정과 관련한 문제
Ⅲ. 200해리 이원 대륙붕 상부수역의 법제도 보장
Ⅳ. 결 론

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

김현정(KIM, Hyun Jung). (2012).200해리 이원 대륙붕 제도의 두 가지 쟁점. 국제법평론, (35), 113-143

MLA

김현정(KIM, Hyun Jung). "200해리 이원 대륙붕 제도의 두 가지 쟁점." 국제법평론, .35(2012): 113-143

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제