본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

자살관여행위의 가벌성 근거

이용수 332

영문명
발행기관
한국형사법학회
저자명
박무원(Park, Moo-Won)
간행물 정보
『형사법연구』형사법연구 제23권 제1호, 119~144쪽, 전체 26쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2011.02.27
5,920

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

The core of the problem of the crime of aiding and abetting suicide(§252②, Criminal Law) is a rational explanation for the basis of punishability for suicide participation and its commencement of the commission from premises that suicide participation is provided in the same article with murder upon request and homicide with consent and it has same statutory penalty. Although it is the predominant view that suicide participation is a separate principal offense type in spite of the act patterns of committing abetment and assist, actual profit of distinction suicide participation that is provided in the form of accomplice from murder upon request in the form of principal is not inconsiderable. Even though suicide participation is punishable enough by being prepared its special constituent requisite, the dependency of accomplice shall not be disregarded for the reasons of act of committing in the accomplice form of abetting and assist. In many cases, the legality theory of suicide or the legal free zone theory of suicide is supported by the independent crime theory of suicide, but we shall not regard disposal of life as legal conduct or evaluation-suspended conduct. Because the interest of respect for each individual's self-determination right should not accomplished in the matter of life disposal that means destruction of each individual. In the concern of life disposal, both of the right self-determination(autonomy) and life(existence) are violated in homicide, but only life(existence) is violated in the crimes of homicide with consent. Such difference between these two types of crime is the base of reduction illegality and punishment of homicide with consent and suicide participation against homicide. Suicide is illegal misconduct although it has committed on one's responsibility. Because blocking commitment of suicide is completely legal and adequate behavior without composing violence whether suicide is self-answerable or not.

목차

Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 자살적법설과 자살관여죄의 처벌근거
Ⅲ. 자살위법설과 자살관여죄의 처벌근거
Ⅳ. 나오며
[참고문헌]
〈Abstract〉

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

박무원(Park, Moo-Won). (2011).자살관여행위의 가벌성 근거. 형사법연구, 23 (1), 119-144

MLA

박무원(Park, Moo-Won). "자살관여행위의 가벌성 근거." 형사법연구, 23.1(2011): 119-144

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제