학술논문
우리/라깡이 너무나 잘 알아서 잘 모르는 것
이용수 282
- 영문명
- What Is Too Familiar for Us/Lacan to Know: Revisit to Lacanian Conception of Masculinity with Films 3-Iron, Lust, Caution, and Dream
- 발행기관
- 한국비평이론학회
- 저자명
- 정경훈(Jung, Kyunghoon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『비평과 이론』제15권 2호, 179~201쪽, 전체 23쪽
- 주제분류
- 어문학 > 영어와문학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.12.30
5,560원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
For many Lacanians, Lacan in Seminar XX seems to argue that man is wholly castrated by the phallic function and can enjoy only idiotic, masturbatory masculine jouissance, whereas woman is not wholly subjected to the phallic function and has the access to the non-phallic other jouissance and that woman is the true subject, man being the idiot who does not know the existence of the jouissance other than the masculine jouissance. This position of many Lacanians about man is shared by film 3-Iron. However, such a simplification of masculinity becomes problematic when we see films Lust, Caution and Dream and consider Lacan's own previous emphasis of the real in the subject. 3-Iron, Lust, Caution, and Dream present three different types of men. 3-Iron represents a typical idiotic man, Minkyu, who is imprisoned in his masculine world of the ego, possession, dominance, and attachment, and does not know the existence of transcendental feminine alterity of his wife. Dream portrays a tough journey of Jin, a Minkyu-like typical man, at the end of which he comes to break with his masculine world by his ethical responsibility for the sexual other's suffering and succeeds in reaching her. Yi of Lust, Caution is a man entrapped between the positions of Minkyu and Jin. Lacan, who declared "there is no such a thing as a sexual relationship" in Seminar XX, says in Seminar XXIII Le Sinthome that sexual relationship is possible through sinthome. This self-correction of Lacan suggests that we should reinterpret and correct his previous simplification of man in Seminar XX. According to Lacan in Seminar XXIII Le Sinthome, man can traverse the symptom-fantasy to reach his true subjectivity by creating his own sinthome(-signifier). Now we should represent man as a subject who can break with his idiotic masturbatory "masculine" position and make access to non-phallic true jouissance, which is not necessarily feminine. This later position of Lacan about man is similar to that of Jin of Dream. The newly born neo-subject is not immured any longer in the phallic and can make a sexual relationship with his partner.
목차
I
II
III
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
어문학 > 영어와문학분야 BEST
더보기어문학 > 영어와문학분야 NEW
- 현대 비극의 ‘사라지는 하마르티아’와 ‘투쟁의 운명’
- Transitions of (The) Flower Drum Song: From Chin Yang Lee to David Henry Hwang
- 영어 부정극어 발화유형 비교
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!