학술논문
계약상 의무위반과 구제법리
이용수 368
- 영문명
- Remidies for Breach of Contract
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 홍성재(Sung-Jae Hong)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』財産法硏究 第27卷 第2號, 155~203쪽, 전체 49쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2010.10.30
8,680원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
A party in a contract should perform the duty of the contract. The duty of contract consists of main performance obligation, collateral obligation and protective obligation. Main performance obligation corresponds to the duty which determines the substance and nature of a contract. In case when main performance obligation is infringed, it can enforce the performance of the contract, and the compensation for the breach of contract and cancellation of the contract are admitted. And collateral obligation is the duty for the purpose of protecting benefits of a contract. Although there is an argument whether to classify performance obligation into main performance obligation and collateral obligation or not, these are distinguished from each other in this study. That is because unlike infringing main performance obligation, violating collateral obligation is not allowed to enforce to perform or cancel the contract. It is only allowed to claim damage reparations.
Also, a duty of safety is not based on the party’s will, but on forcd obligation in accordance with good faith and fair dealing. And unlike the collateral obligation, the duty of safety aims at protecting another party’s
integrity or existing interest. But, in case of violating the duty of safety, it is not allowed to force the performance of duty, but is only allowed to claim for damage reparations. This kind of duty of safety holds good from the process after the extinguishment of the contract. Also, a third party beside the party involved in the contract can the person concerned of protective obligation. However, even though these have the same substance, a duty to give attention to and protective obligation should be distinguished. The reason is that among the duties to give attention to, there is a case which belongs to performance obligation that entails a certain legal relation like labor contracts. Also, even if both of them accompany legal benefits, the transit security duty of tort law and the protective obligation of contract law should be distinguished. The party who is damaged by violating duty of safety, rather than the party who is damaged by infringing transit security duty, is able to receive remedy for the right according to legal principles of contract liability, which is superior in aspects of responsibility for proof or extinctive rescription. In the meantime, the obligation of contract as above belongs to the substance of a obligation, so violating it is applicable to non-fulfillment. Then it takes different remedies according to the case of non-fulfillment; delay in performance, non-impossibility and imperfect performance. Also it takes different requirement according to the ways of remedy for the right; forcing the performance of obligation, claiming compensation for the damage or canceling a contract. Especially, in case that excessive damage beyond benefits of a contract is incurred because of non-impossibility and imperfect performance, there is no room for claiming forced performance or canceling a contract. And unlike forced performance, in order to claim compensation for the damage, the damage due to the breach of contract should be incurred because of the reason that obligor can be blamed of. Besides, in case of canceling the contract, obligor should be responsible forthat. However, in occasion of delay in performance, it is allowed to cancel the contract only when it doesn't perform the obligation of contract within a grace period. Of course, in case that obligation of a onerous contract is imperfectly performed, damaged party can claim responsibility about warranties liability of non-negligence. of negotiating a contract, through the process of realization of the contract, obligor should be responsible for that.
목차
Ⅰ. 서 론
Ⅱ. 계약상 의무의 체계
Ⅲ. 주된 급부의무 위반과 채무불이행
Ⅳ. 부수적 의무와 그 위반에 따른 효과
Ⅴ. 보호의무와 그 위반으로 인한 책임
Ⅵ. 맺는 말
키워드
행위의무
거래안전의무
주된 급부의무
부수적 의무
보호의무
채무불이행
강제이행
손해배상
계약의 해제
계약책임
계약체결상의 과실책임
채무불이행책임
불법행위책임 등
Duty to Act Carefully
Transit Security Duty
Duty to Provide Information
Main Performance Obligation
Collateral Obligation
Protective Obligation
Non-Fulfillment of Obligation
Cancellation of Contract
Contract Liability
Culpa in Contrahendo
Liability for Non-Fulfillment of Obligation
Tort Liability
etc.
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 일본의 사외이사제도를 둘러싼 최근 동향과 과제
- 계약상 의무위반과 구제법리
- 입주자대표회의의 방해배제청구권
- 연예인과 관련된 분쟁에서 중재제도의 활용에 관한 소고
- 集合債權 讓渡擔保와 否認權의 行使
- 통합도산법상 특수관계인 규정의 개선 제안
- 중국 불법행위법상의 징벌적 손해배상제도
- 이자제한법에 의한 고리규제
- 전속계약에 따른 법적문제와 해결방안
- 특수지역권의 재고
- 생명보험 표준약관상 보험계약의 특별부활에 대한 제언
- 인터넷쇼핑몰거래에 있어 착오취소에 관한 주요쟁점
- 사이버명예훼손 피해의 민사적 구제에 관한 고찰
- 소비자법 민법전편입의 이론적 근거와 방향성
- 하자담보책임법 개정을 위한 논의와 방향성을 위한 소고
- 民事上 公人에 대한 名譽毁損責任의 成立要件
- 契約解除時 履行利益과 信賴利益의 關係에 관한 小考
- 다단계판매의 개념 및 판단기준에 대한 고찰
- 독일 보험계약법상 잠정적인 보상에 대한 연구
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!