전후 한·일 양국의 민주 시민윤리의 수용비교

• 영문명: Comparisons between Korea's and Japan's acceptance of Democratic Civic Ethics
• 발행기관: 성신여자대학교 교육문제연구소
• 저자명: 유근호(Yu Kun-Ho)
• 간행물 정보: 『교육연구』제34집, 1~21쪽, 전체 21쪽
• 주제분류: 사회과학 > 교육학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2000.02.28

국문 초록

본 논문은 한, 일 양국이 1945년 이전에 일본의 천황제 지배체제하에서 실시된 봉건적인 도덕교육이, 전후 미군저을 통하여 학교 교육 속에서 어떻게 개편되었으며, 새롭게 실시된 학교의 도덕교육과정은, 그 후 양국에 있어서 정치, 사회적인 변화와 더불어 어떠한 특성을 가지고 변화되어 갔는가를 비교 분석함으로써, 양국의 학교의 민주주의 도덕교육의 특성을 알아보는데 목적이 있다.

영문 초록

The main goal of this thesis is to demonstrate how the conventional moral education system, which both Korea and Japan practiced before 1945, under the Japanese Imperial regime, has reorganized after American occupancy. Furthermore, we will study the changes in politics and social status after the establishment of the new school moral education system, and will compare the different characteristics both nations held when establishing this new system, hence determining both the nations democratic school moral education characteristics. After World War Ⅱ, under American military regime, Korean and Japan set their immediate goals as democracy. In the matter of educational systems, both nations hoped to train the Imperial citizens, from before the war, away from conventional ethics education, such as loyalty and filial duty, by introducing the new democratic ideology. This meant setting their goals as improving the quality of moral education for democratic citizen by carrying out a new system of moral education. However, because of the nations differences in politics, history and society, the new democratic moral educational system showed considerable differences in educational goals and content. As a result, we can conclude that both nations had variations on how youths understood and accepted democracy taught to them. With these problems in mind, this thesis examined both nations process in reorganizing the moral education system form before and after the war, and examined the nations democratic moral education characteristics and the influence this had on the citizens in the make up of democracy in both nations. In Korea, democracy was taught to citizens with patriotism and ideology directly connection with each other through ethics and morals. Koreans focused their aims as the spread of democracy, democratic character, and democratic direction in general. As a result of this, Koreans focused on inner morals, as they set their basis on humanitarian moral standards. On the other hand, Japan taught their citizens of democracy that was demanded in society. They focused on a standard of behavior that was needed in social life. As a result they understood democracy as an integration of procedure and method so we can conclude that this allowed them to spread their style of democracy form their government, and to their everyday life.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론

Ⅱ. 본론

Ⅲ. 결론

참고문헌

영문초록