학술논문
가사소송절차에 관한 몇 가지 문제점
이용수 106
- 영문명
- Problems with the Domestic Litigations
- 발행기관
- 충북대학교 법학연구소
- 저자명
- 김원태(Kim, Won-Tae)
- 간행물 정보
- 『법학연구』第20卷 第1號 (2009), 121~158쪽, 전체 38쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2009.06.30
7,360원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This study was based on interest in authority detection in Domestic Litigations and the roles of the person concerned in such litigations.
The court's power of authority detection should be interpreted to be accompanied by duties. Considering the subjecthood of the person concerned, the court needs to admit that its authority detection is not without limitations or restrictions but does have some limitations.
In interpreting and applying the Family Law Litigation Act, both the sides must be considered; one is that Domestic Litigations belong to the case category that requires the court's guardianship called authority detection; and the other is that the intervention of public power should be avoided as much as possible since they involve highly private matters. Thus the right ways to go are to exercise authority detection thoroughly where guardian interventions are required by analyzing the case and to interpret and apply authority detection as supplementary where the concerned person's right to deal with the issue is approved.
Under authority detection, it's natural that the concerned person's right to procedures must be secured and that the court should not be allowed to recognize as facts the matters about which the concerned person was not given a chance to refute or make an excuse. The next revision of the Family Law Litigation Act should newly include a provision of informing the parties interested of the litigation materials collected by the court and providing them with a chance to offer their statements so that they can prepare themselves for defense.
Finally, the following suggestions were made for the revision from the perspective of legislation:
Article 17(authority detection) : ⓛ When examining Domestic Litigations of GA class or NA class, the family court must look into facts and gather necessary evidence and can ask for cooperations from the person concerned. ② The family court can take into consideration of the facts not argued by the person concerned and interrogate the person concerned or his or her legal proxy any time. In such a case, the family court must listen to the opinions of the person concerned regarding the facts and the results of evidence gathering.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 가사소송에서의 심리원칙과 변론주의의 관계
Ⅲ. 직권탐지의 범위와 당사자의 협력의무
Ⅳ. 공익과 직권탐지 정도의 소송유형별 검토
Ⅴ. 맺는말
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!