본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

영국형법상 범죄의 주관적 요소

이용수 208

영문명
The mens rea in the Anglo-American Criminal Law
발행기관
충북대학교 법학연구소
저자명
이경재(Lee, Kyung-Jae)
간행물 정보
『법학연구』第20卷 第1號 (2009), 35~56쪽, 전체 22쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2009.06.30
5,440

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

Our Criminal Law system derived from the Continental Legal system, especially Germany and Japan, but in recent years the Anglo-American legal system have been introduced into our legal system. However, it is said to be problematic to introduce foreign system without profound study or consideration: for example, the jury system. Therefore it need to be carefully studied foreign legal system. In Anglo-American Criminal Law, it is necessary for a act to have a actus reus and mens rea to be a crime: actus reus means the external element of a crime and mens rea mental element. The majority of criminal offences require, in addition to the actus reus, a specific state of mind on the part of the accused. In order for a criminal offence to be complete, the actus reus and mens rea must coincide in time. This rule can be of great practical importance, because it is often difficult to prove exactly when the mens rea was formed: the accused may argue successfully that the necessary mens rea was not formed until after the actus reus has been completed. Although each offences has its own mens rea, there are a number of mens rea word which occur frequently in the definitions of offences and which need to be examined. Mens rea terms can play a variety of function in the criminal law. Among mens rea, there are intention, knowledge and belief, recklessness, and negligence. Intention can be used as "constituting a harm', meaning that an act which would otherwise be blameless is made criminal law by the intention with which it is carried out. Many crimes require that an act should knowingly do something. Even wilful blindness may constitute knowledge. English law treats someone as knowing something if, being pretty sure that it is so, he deliberately avoids asking questions which might confirm the fact. An actor must normally be judged on the facts as he believes them to be. Someone is reckless if he or she takes unjustified risks. Recklessness is the necessary mens rea for many offences: Criminal damage, arson, assault, wounding. Perhaps it is simply the huge variety of offences which rely on recklessness as the basis of the necessary guilty mind which has given rise to the difficulties in its definition. Negligence compare the actions of the accused with those of a hypothetical reasonable person. a negligent act is one that falls below the standards expected of a reasonable ordinary prudent person.

목차

I.들어가는 말
II.영미형법상 범죄의 개념과 성립요건
III.Intention
IV.Knowledge와 Belief
V.Recklessness
VI.과실(Negligence)
VII.그밖의 mensrea:악의(malice)와 소지(possesion)
VIII.맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이경재(Lee, Kyung-Jae). (2009).영국형법상 범죄의 주관적 요소. 법학연구, 20 (1), 35-56

MLA

이경재(Lee, Kyung-Jae). "영국형법상 범죄의 주관적 요소." 법학연구, 20.1(2009): 35-56

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제