학술논문
인사ㆍ조직연구의 발전과 미래 과제 - 인사ㆍ조직연구 게재논문과 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 학술대회 발표논문 분석결과를 중심으로
이용수 1341
- 영문명
- Evolution of Organizational Analysis in the Korean Journal of Management, 1992~2007
- 발행기관
- 한국인사조직학회
- 저자명
- 이경묵(Kyungmook Lee)
- 간행물 정보
- 『인사조직연구』인사·조직연구 제16권 제3호, 161~211쪽, 전체 51쪽
- 주제분류
- 경제경영 > 경영학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2008.09.30
8,920원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
본 논문은 1990년 창립된 한국인사？조직학회의 학술지인 인사ㆍ조직연구가 한국 인사조직 연구 분야의 발전에 공헌한 점을 평가하고, 앞으로 한국 인사조직 분야의 추가적인 발전을 위해 수행해야 할 미래 과제를 도출하는 것을 주 목적으로 한다. 이를 위해 본 연구에서는 인사？조직연구의 창간호부터 2007년 12월에 출간된 제15권 제4호까지 게재된 218편의 논문과 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 학술대회 발표논문집에 수록된 478편의 논문을 분석하였다. 그리고 이 분석결과를 “한국인 사조직연구의 현황과 과제”라는 주제로 1993년 인사ㆍ조직연구 특집호에 게재된 4편의 논문에서 분석한 결과와 비교하였다. 비교결과를 바탕으로 앞의 4편의 논문에서 제시한 한국 인사조직 분야 연구의 문제점 해결에 인사ㆍ조직연구가 지금까지 어떤 공헌을 해 왔는지를 평가하였고, 이를 바탕으로 인사ㆍ조직연구가 수행해야 할 미래 과제를 제시하였다.
영문 초록
This study aims at evaluating the contribution of the Korean Jounal of Management and providing future directions of the journal. The Korean Academy of Mangement were established in 1990 to encourage rigorous reseach in management area, which emcompass organizational behavior, human resource management, industrial relations, and strategic management. The academy began to publish its flagship journal-the Korean Journal of Management-in 1992. In 1993, the journal published four papers that investigated major trends in management research, identified major problems, and provided future research directions. This study compared three sets of papers : (1) papers analysed by the above mentioned four papars, (2) 218 articles published in the Korean Journal of Management, and (3) 478 papers presented in the conferences of the Korean Academy of Management.
Articles in the journal and papers presented in the conferences are classified by several criteria. First, the fields of research are divided into 6 categories : micro organizational behavior, macro organizational theory, human resource management, industrial relations, strategic management, and research method. Second, I classify the major research topic of the articles in each fields of research. Third, conceptual papers are differentiated from empirical ones. Fourth, major research designs are separated into 5 categories : literature review, case research method, survey data method, experimental design, and others. Fifth, data and methods that were used by empirical papers are classified by several criteria : (1) cross?sectional data vs. longitudinal data, (2) data collection methods : survey questionnaire, interview/observation, experiment, secondary data source, and others, (3) level of analysis : individual, group or team, organization, population, and cross level analysis, and (4) sources of data from single organization, multiple organizations from the single industry, and multiple organizations from multiple industries. The fifth criteria are not applied to classify 478 papers presented in the conferences.
Findings are as follow First, the journal has substantially contributed to the increase of the number of quality research papers in management fields. The journal has maintained its highest level of standards among Korean journals in management reseach field in screening papers. To be published, papers should have strong theoretical argument and/or rigorous research method. The journal contributes to enhance the quality of management research conducted by Korean management researchers. Second, the journal failed to encourage the development of creative new theories or the emergence of theories applicable to Korean situations. Though the four 1993 papers asked for these kinds of papers, there are few articles in the journal that can be classified as those kinds of papers. Third, the journal has only limited contribution in encouraging research on diverse topics. The research topics investigated by the articles in the journal have been diversified. However, it cannot be solely attributed to the journal since researchers could have naturally responded to the changes in hot research topics caused by major changes in business environment. Fourth, the journal has not contributed in encouraging research papers that utilize case research method, experiment, or longitudinal data. Since the journal has pursued methodological rigor, a very large portion of articles have used multivariate analysis with large survery data.
Based on the findings, possible new directions of the journal are discussed. First, the journal should deal with an issue about how to accommodate conceptual papers, papers investigating new research topics, and papers developing theories that can help Korean companies. If the journal sticks to the methodological rigor, it cannot accommodate those papers. One solution can be using special issue to publ
Articles in the journal and papers presented in the conferences are classified by several criteria. First, the fields of research are divided into 6 categories : micro organizational behavior, macro organizational theory, human resource management, industrial relations, strategic management, and research method. Second, I classify the major research topic of the articles in each fields of research. Third, conceptual papers are differentiated from empirical ones. Fourth, major research designs are separated into 5 categories : literature review, case research method, survey data method, experimental design, and others. Fifth, data and methods that were used by empirical papers are classified by several criteria : (1) cross?sectional data vs. longitudinal data, (2) data collection methods : survey questionnaire, interview/observation, experiment, secondary data source, and others, (3) level of analysis : individual, group or team, organization, population, and cross level analysis, and (4) sources of data from single organization, multiple organizations from the single industry, and multiple organizations from multiple industries. The fifth criteria are not applied to classify 478 papers presented in the conferences.
Findings are as follow First, the journal has substantially contributed to the increase of the number of quality research papers in management fields. The journal has maintained its highest level of standards among Korean journals in management reseach field in screening papers. To be published, papers should have strong theoretical argument and/or rigorous research method. The journal contributes to enhance the quality of management research conducted by Korean management researchers. Second, the journal failed to encourage the development of creative new theories or the emergence of theories applicable to Korean situations. Though the four 1993 papers asked for these kinds of papers, there are few articles in the journal that can be classified as those kinds of papers. Third, the journal has only limited contribution in encouraging research on diverse topics. The research topics investigated by the articles in the journal have been diversified. However, it cannot be solely attributed to the journal since researchers could have naturally responded to the changes in hot research topics caused by major changes in business environment. Fourth, the journal has not contributed in encouraging research papers that utilize case research method, experiment, or longitudinal data. Since the journal has pursued methodological rigor, a very large portion of articles have used multivariate analysis with large survery data.
Based on the findings, possible new directions of the journal are discussed. First, the journal should deal with an issue about how to accommodate conceptual papers, papers investigating new research topics, and papers developing theories that can help Korean companies. If the journal sticks to the methodological rigor, it cannot accommodate those papers. One solution can be using special issue to publ
목차
〈초록〉
Ⅰ. 머리글
Ⅱ. 기존 연구에 대한 검토
Ⅲ. 자료와 분석 방법
Ⅳ. 분석결과
Ⅴ. 토론과 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 머리글
Ⅱ. 기존 연구에 대한 검토
Ⅲ. 자료와 분석 방법
Ⅳ. 분석결과
Ⅴ. 토론과 결론
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!