본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

계약체결상의 과실책임의 재검토

이용수 182

영문명
A Critical Analysis on Culpa in Contrahendo
발행기관
한국사법학회(구 한국비교사법학회)
저자명
이충훈(Choong-Hoon Lee)
간행물 정보
『비교사법』比較私法 제14권 제4호, 1~34쪽, 전체 34쪽
주제분류
법학 > 법학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2007.12.30
6,880

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

  It is widely understood that culpa in contrahendo means the liability to compensate for the loss which is incurred as a result of one party’s misconduct o another party in the process of negotiating a contract as well as at the stage of preparing for the contract. Culpa in contrahendo is known to be derived from certain unique features of German laws. German tort laws list the cases where tort is established, but they do not cover the pure property loss. Thus, the pure property loss which is incurred in the process of negotiating a contract, shall be subject to the contract liability. On the other hand, the Korean Civil Code extends the liability to compensate for loss to the property loss which is incurred at the contract negotiating state. Therefore, we are of the view that there is no need to introduce the theory of culpa in contrahendo to the Korea Civil Code.
  In Korea. it is a prevailing view that in cases where the property loss incurs in the process of negotiating a contract and where a contract is valid, culpa in contrahendo shall be established even when the contract in question becomes invalid. However, it is possible to interpret that under the Korean Civil Code, the liability of torts could be established even when culpa in contrahendo is denied.
  Pursuant to Article 535 of the Korean Civil Code, the liability to compensate for loss is assumed when a party of contract was aware of the fact that a contract of initial impossibility was invalid or when the party was in a position to recognize the fact. On the other hand, in 2002, Germany revoked Article 307 of its Civil Code which contained the same provision as the Korean Civil Code. Therefore. it is appropriate to revoke Article 535 of the Korean Civil Code.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 계약체결상의 과실책임의 유형 검토
Ⅲ. 결론
【참고문헌】
[Abstract]

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

이충훈(Choong-Hoon Lee). (2007).계약체결상의 과실책임의 재검토. 비교사법, 14 (4), 1-34

MLA

이충훈(Choong-Hoon Lee). "계약체결상의 과실책임의 재검토." 비교사법, 14.4(2007): 1-34

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제