중재합의의 유효성에 관한 미국법원의 해석과 함의

• 영문명: The U.S Court"s Interpretation of the Validity of Arbitral Agreements and Its Implication
• 발행기관: 한국국제상학회
• 저자명: 하충룡(Choong-lyong Ha) 박원형(Won-hyung Park)
• 간행물 정보: 『국제상학』國際商學 第22卷 第1號, 149~168쪽, 전체 20쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2007.03.30

영문 초록

  This article focuses on comparative analysis between the U.S. and Korea through their Arbitration Acts, drawing its implication through the U.S. case laws regarding the validity of arbitral agreements. Based on the explanation on relevant arbitral agreement provisions, requirements of validity of arbitral agreements are established. In addition, related legal issues are dealt with through the U.S. case laws.
  Basic meanings of arbitral agreements in Dispute Resolution Process don"t exclude the right legal systems of certain countries grant the parties. That"s why the court of law intervenes in the area of arbitration in order to preserve the parties" rights. Nevertheless, in Korea, case laws can"t play a role as a gap-filler for Korea Arbitration Act because relevant cases are not common.
  This paper will provide us useful and meaningful guidances for better arbitral process in reviewing well-established U.S. cases.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중재합의의 유효성
Ⅲ. 중재가능성에 관한 연방법원의 태도
Ⅳ. 함의 및 시사점
Ⅴ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

Validity of Arbitral Agreements Arbitrability Public Policy