학술논문
신활력지역의 발전방향에 관한 연구
이용수 28
- 영문명
- A Study on Development Strategies in the New-vitalizing Region
- 발행기관
- 안양대학교 수도권발전연구소
- 저자명
- 이정식
- 간행물 정보
- 『수도권연구』제3호, 19~34쪽, 전체 16쪽
- 주제분류
- 사회과학 > 지역개발
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.11.01
4,720원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
This paper is aimed at examining both the limitation of existing development strategies of lagging regions in Korea, and the development schemes of newly designated the so-called New-vitalizing regions based on the paradigm for more balanced regional development in the 21st century. Another attempt is also made to propose a few recommendations for achieving such New-vitalizing regional development more effectively.
For the past four decades, the Korean government has employed various policy instruments to promote regional development in lagging regions and thereby converge regional disparities. A number of policy instruments include the designation and development of the Special Development Area, the remote mountainous and island areas, the DMZ vicinity area and the Development Promotion Zone, and so on. However, government"s such strenuous efforts have not been successful as expected, partly because of duplicated investment by different government agencies concerned and top-down planning process, and partly because of arbitrary budget allocation resulting from insufficient feasibility studies.
In order to overcome these shortcomings, the government, more specifically the Presidential Committee on Balanced National Development and the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, introduced the concept of New-vitalizing region to pursue not only regional development of existing lagging regions more comprehensively, but accomplish self-reliant localization by means of bottom-up approaches. The government thus selected 70 cities and counties out of 234 local autonomous bodies as the New-vitalizing region based on the development indicators such as the annual average population growth rate, population density, financial capability and residents" taxes. Such selected regions are provided with government subsidies of total 200billion Won for the first stage in period of 2005-2007, focusing on software-oriented development projects.
The new attempts, however, need a few improvements in implementing such development strategies more efficiently. First, the implementation system needs to be unified to eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic regulations and overlapped investment. And the annual evaluation system of both project plan and accomplishments is also recommended to be revised to lengthen the period of evaluation, for example 2-3 years, to promote development projects in more consistent and comprehensive ways. Second, investment fund at the central level needs to be expanded. The average 2-3billion Won per annum for each region is not so enough to improve the income level in lagging regions. And the flexibility for spending by New-vitalizing regions should be heightened to encourage both building the Regional Innovation Systems(RIS), and bottom-up planning and implementation processes. Third, the newly adopted consulting system for each region, called the Family Doctor, is relatively unfamiliar theme in Korea. The idea itself is very fresh, but each consultant is not necessarily a omni-scientist. The consulting body is thus suggested to be consisted of experts in relevant academic and practical fields with the Family Doctor as the central figure.
As preconditions for an equity policy, anyhow, political commitment to more balanced regional development is of great importance in Korea. Continuous attention and almost single-minded commitment of political and administrative leaders at both central and local levels are required to promote the New-vitalizing regional development projects consistently. Furthermore, the attitude of the central government has not yet fully kept the pace with the strong decentralization endeavor. Some efforts should be thus devoted to change the administrative culture accompanying the institutional reform.
For the past four decades, the Korean government has employed various policy instruments to promote regional development in lagging regions and thereby converge regional disparities. A number of policy instruments include the designation and development of the Special Development Area, the remote mountainous and island areas, the DMZ vicinity area and the Development Promotion Zone, and so on. However, government"s such strenuous efforts have not been successful as expected, partly because of duplicated investment by different government agencies concerned and top-down planning process, and partly because of arbitrary budget allocation resulting from insufficient feasibility studies.
In order to overcome these shortcomings, the government, more specifically the Presidential Committee on Balanced National Development and the Ministry of Government Administration and Home Affairs, introduced the concept of New-vitalizing region to pursue not only regional development of existing lagging regions more comprehensively, but accomplish self-reliant localization by means of bottom-up approaches. The government thus selected 70 cities and counties out of 234 local autonomous bodies as the New-vitalizing region based on the development indicators such as the annual average population growth rate, population density, financial capability and residents" taxes. Such selected regions are provided with government subsidies of total 200billion Won for the first stage in period of 2005-2007, focusing on software-oriented development projects.
The new attempts, however, need a few improvements in implementing such development strategies more efficiently. First, the implementation system needs to be unified to eliminate unnecessary bureaucratic regulations and overlapped investment. And the annual evaluation system of both project plan and accomplishments is also recommended to be revised to lengthen the period of evaluation, for example 2-3 years, to promote development projects in more consistent and comprehensive ways. Second, investment fund at the central level needs to be expanded. The average 2-3billion Won per annum for each region is not so enough to improve the income level in lagging regions. And the flexibility for spending by New-vitalizing regions should be heightened to encourage both building the Regional Innovation Systems(RIS), and bottom-up planning and implementation processes. Third, the newly adopted consulting system for each region, called the Family Doctor, is relatively unfamiliar theme in Korea. The idea itself is very fresh, but each consultant is not necessarily a omni-scientist. The consulting body is thus suggested to be consisted of experts in relevant academic and practical fields with the Family Doctor as the central figure.
As preconditions for an equity policy, anyhow, political commitment to more balanced regional development is of great importance in Korea. Continuous attention and almost single-minded commitment of political and administrative leaders at both central and local levels are required to promote the New-vitalizing regional development projects consistently. Furthermore, the attitude of the central government has not yet fully kept the pace with the strong decentralization endeavor. Some efforts should be thus devoted to change the administrative culture accompanying the institutional reform.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 기존 낙후지역 발전전략의 한계
Ⅲ. 신활력지역의 선정과 신활력사업
Ⅳ. 신활력사업의 발전방향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
Ⅱ. 기존 낙후지역 발전전략의 한계
Ⅲ. 신활력지역의 선정과 신활력사업
Ⅳ. 신활력사업의 발전방향
Ⅴ. 맺음말
참고문헌
ABSTRACT
해당간행물 수록 논문
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!