학술논문
우리나라의 부동산 선매제도에 관한 연구
이용수 40
- 영문명
- A Study on Korean Real Estate Preemptive Rights System
- 발행기관
- 한국부동산학회
- 저자명
- 장건(Jang Geon)
- 간행물 정보
- 『부동산학보』不動産學報 第26輯, 104~121쪽, 전체 18쪽
- 주제분류
- 경제경영 > 경영학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.05.01
4,960원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Real estate preemption has become one system for carrying out
important land policies on public and private laws. However, the positive law in Korea has not yet acknowledged a preemptive right, but has only a preemptive consultation right, that is, a right with which a public agency can talk over the preferential purchase of the land concerned. Thus, I will explore the comparative law problems about the system and the nature, reality and future tasks of Korean preemption system.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
Korea much lacks studies on real estate preemptive rights system. This study, therefore, focused on one thesis for a doctorate and ten academic theses about the system, analyzed the literature about it, and described its theoretical system in comparison with Korean systems related to preemption. Thus, this study began with an investigation on a comparative law in Chapter 2, explored preemptive rights in Germany in Chapter 3 and Korean systems related to preemption in Chapters 4 and 5, and described future tasks and concluded in Chapters 6 and 7.
(3) RESEARCH RESULTS
From the perspective on a comparative law, it will be said that German bonding preemption system has different legal, institutional, and structural system from Korean real estate preemptive consultation right.
2. RESULTS
Korean civil law does not have any regulations about preemptive rights and the preemptive consultation rights cannot be compared with the preemptive rights in German civil law. Korea will rely on the method of provisional registration for the preferential acquisition of a particular thing in the future. It can also examine the regulations about the preemptive rights that those with surface rights, those with lease rights, and those with hire rights can purchase the thing preferentially at the sale price when the owner wants to sell it. From the viewpoint of comparative jurisprudence, German preemptive system will be said to have different legal institutional structural system from that of Korean preemptive consultation rights system.
It is necessary to improve the preemptive consultation system by means of Korean "Law on the Planning and Use of National Land". Above all, the requirements for preemptive consultation should be improved. For example, a land owner tries to settle surface or lease rights for the third party. When one with preemptive consultation rights wants to purchase it, I think, he should consult about the purchase and sale.
Though land preemptive consultation rights need to be acknowledged for a public purpose, it is essential to protect the rights of a land owner. Rather, it will be said to be desirable to have a public agency enter into preemptive consultation insofar as a land owner wants to purchase an0d sell it.
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Real estate preemption has become one system for carrying out
important land policies on public and private laws. However, the positive law in Korea has not yet acknowledged a preemptive right, but has only a preemptive consultation right, that is, a right with which a public agency can talk over the preferential purchase of the land concerned. Thus, I will explore the comparative law problems about the system and the nature, reality and future tasks of Korean preemption system.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
Korea much lacks studies on real estate preemptive rights system. This study, therefore, focused on one thesis for a doctorate and ten academic theses about the system, analyzed the literature about it, and described its theoretical system in comparison with Korean systems related to preemption. Thus, this study began with an investigation on a comparative law in Chapter 2, explored preemptive rights in Germany in Chapter 3 and Korean systems related to preemption in Chapters 4 and 5, and described future tasks and concluded in Chapters 6 and 7.
(3) RESEARCH RESULTS
From the perspective on a comparative law, it will be said that German bonding preemption system has different legal, institutional, and structural system from Korean real estate preemptive consultation right.
2. RESULTS
Korean civil law does not have any regulations about preemptive rights and the preemptive consultation rights cannot be compared with the preemptive rights in German civil law. Korea will rely on the method of provisional registration for the preferential acquisition of a particular thing in the future. It can also examine the regulations about the preemptive rights that those with surface rights, those with lease rights, and those with hire rights can purchase the thing preferentially at the sale price when the owner wants to sell it. From the viewpoint of comparative jurisprudence, German preemptive system will be said to have different legal institutional structural system from that of Korean preemptive consultation rights system.
It is necessary to improve the preemptive consultation system by means of Korean "Law on the Planning and Use of National Land". Above all, the requirements for preemptive consultation should be improved. For example, a land owner tries to settle surface or lease rights for the third party. When one with preemptive consultation rights wants to purchase it, I think, he should consult about the purchase and sale.
Though land preemptive consultation rights need to be acknowledged for a public purpose, it is essential to protect the rights of a land owner. Rather, it will be said to be desirable to have a public agency enter into preemptive consultation insofar as a land owner wants to purchase an0d sell it.
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 先買에 관한 比較法的 考察
Ⅲ. 獨逸에서의 土地先買權
Ⅳ. 우리나라에서의 先買權 關聯 制度
Ⅴ. 우리나라에서의 土地先買協議權
Ⅵ. 우리나라 先買制度의 限界 및 向後課題
Ⅶ. 結論
參考文獻
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 先買에 관한 比較法的 考察
Ⅲ. 獨逸에서의 土地先買權
Ⅳ. 우리나라에서의 先買權 關聯 制度
Ⅴ. 우리나라에서의 土地先買協議權
Ⅵ. 우리나라 先買制度의 限界 및 向後課題
Ⅶ. 結論
參考文獻
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 주택보급률에 따른 조세정책의 성찰과 개선방향
- 동대문재래상권의 현황분석을 통한 문제점 파악 및 국공유지 개발방향에 대하여
- 백화점의 선택속성에 대한 소비자 선호도 분석 - 서울특별시 백화점을 중심으로
- 특수토지의 적정가격 산정방안에 관한 소고
- 부산지역 도시정비사업전문관리업의 정착방안에 관한 연구
- 8ㆍ31 부동산종합대책의 파급효과와 향후 시장전망
- 후분양제도 도입에 따른 주택재건축사업의 사업성 비교 연구 - 서울시를 중심으로
- 공시지가와 감정평가가격의 괴리수준에 관한 연구 - 감정평가 사례를 중심으로
- 가상적 가치평가법을 이용한 아파트경관가치의 측정에 관한 연구 - 강원도 춘천시를 중심으로
- 우리나라의 부동산 선매제도에 관한 연구
- 실버타운 수요자 분석을 통한 개발모델과 마케팅 전략수립에 관한 일고 - 대구지역을 중심으로
- 다변량분석을 이용한 전주시의 상권분석에 관한 연구
- 토지이용규제의 합리적 운영방안에 관한 연구 - 용도지역ㆍ지구를 규정한 법률을 중심으로
- 권두언 : 학보발간에 즈음하여
- 한국 프라이빗뱅킹 고객의 종합자산관리에 부동산이 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!