국가대표 선수들의 Personality 특성에 관한 비교연구 - 개인, 대인 경기 선수들 중심으로

• 영문명: Comparative research about personality characteristics of National Amateurs - to attach importance to the comparison of individual and personal sports players -
• 발행기관: 경희대학교 스포츠과학연구원
• 저자명: 김진호(Kim Jin-Ho) 백옥미(Paik Ok-Mi)
• 간행물 정보: 『체육학논문집』제23집, 13~29쪽, 전체 17쪽
• 주제분류: 예술체육 > 체육
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 1995.12.01

영문 초록

  This research has been carried out to help improve players" competitive ability and scout for them through a precise grasp of their personalities and study of their unique personality characteristics. Forty-two male and forty-nine female National Amateurs who are residing in Tea-Reung Players" Village have been subjects of this research.
  1. Comparison in each Personality Factors between the sports.
  In Factor F (Impulsion), Shooting marked a high average score of 6.99 score. Considerable differences(p＜0.05) were found among Basketball, Weight Lifting and Shooting in Duncan"s post-verification result. In Factor I (Strength), Archery scored a high average mark of 7.58 scored. In Factor L (Reliance), Shooting gained a high average score of 7.11 scored. In Factor Q₁ (Progress), Archery scored a high average mark of 7.82 scored.
  2. Comparison in each Personality Factors between Individual and Personal Sports.
  In Factor G (Perfection), Individual Sports marked 6.02 scores and in Factor I (Strength), Individual 5.76 scores and in Factor L (Reliance), Individual 7.05 scores and in Factor M (Reality), Individual 5.94 scores and in Factor N (Utility), Individual 7.04 scores and finally in Factor Q₃ (Restraint), Individual 5.23 scores From the above results, it was discovered that Individual Sports players marked higher scores than Personal Sports ones.
  3. Comparison in each Personality Factors between male and female.
  In Factor C (Stability), male marked 7.00 points and in Factor I (Strength), female 6.14 5 and in Factor M (Reality), female 5.98 and in Factor O (Guilty), female 5.90 and in Factor Q1 (Progress), female 5.94 and finally in Factor Q₂ (Strain), female scored 5.99 points As in the above results, female players marked relatively higher average points than male ones in all Factors except in Factor C where male marked higher scores than female.
  4. Comparison in each Personality Factors between careers.
  In Factor A (Cordiality), players with more than twelve-year careers marked the highest points of 6.75 and in Duncan"s post-verification result, there were remarkable differences (p＜0.05) between players with 8 to 12-year careers and players with more than 12-year careers. In Factor Q₂ (Independence), players with 8 to 12-year careers gained the highest points of 5.92 and in Duncan"s post-verification result, there were noticeable differences (p＜0.05) between players with 8 to 12-year careers and players with more than 12-year careers.
  5. Comparison in each Personality Factors between occupations.
  Among 16 factors, noticeable differences were indicated in Factor G (Perfection) and in Q3 (Restraint). In Factor G (Perfection), the rest (middle-school) marked the highest scores of 6.76 and in Duncan"s post-verification result, there were considerable differences (p＜0.05) among high-school, under-graduate (graduate) and the rest (middle-school) players. In Factor Q3 (Restraint), professional players gained the highest scores of 6.25 and in Duncan"s post-verification result, remarkable differences(p＜0.05) were found among professional, the rest and high-school players.
  6. Comparison in each Personality Factors between blood types.
  Among 16 factors, noticeable differences (p＜0.05) were indicated in Factor C (Stability) and in Q4 (Strain). In Factor C (Stability), blood type AB marked the highest score of 7.20 and in Duncan"s post-verification result, there were remarkable differences (p＜0.05) among blood type O, B and AB. In Factor Q4 (Strain), blood type B scored the highest average points of 6.12 and in Duncan"s post-verification result, there were considerable differences (p＜0.05) between blood type B and AB.

목차

ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 연구내용 및 방법
Ⅲ. 연구결과 및 고찰
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌