학술논문
가맹사업거래(프랜차이즈)분쟁의 유형과 해결방안
이용수 468
- 영문명
- A Study on the types of franchise dispute and its solution
- 발행기관
- 한국재산법학회
- 저자명
- 염규석(Yeom Gyoo-Seok)
- 간행물 정보
- 『재산법연구』재산법연구 제23권 제1호, 209~245쪽, 전체 37쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2006.06.01
7,240원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
For several decades franchising has been a growing phenomenon of business organization and sales or services distribution. The franchise business has been rapidly grown in Korea. However, since Korean financial crisis, the instability of employment was deepened and the household incomes were decreased in the sudden change of inner and outer environments of Korean society. Thus, retired employee and housewives were attacted to the franchise business due to its merit of demanding small amount of initial capital to make easy access for business foundations.
But the backside of the growth of franchise business, many social problem have occured in franchise business. Especially many franchisee have been damaged by the franchisor who provide exaggerated information or false information.
This dissertation deals with the dispute of franchise and the theoretical ground for a legal issue and a troubleshooting it presented.
This dissertation deals with the legal nature of a franchise contract, the types of the franchise dispute and the returning of franchise fee. In this dissertation I would like to advance a theory to legal problems rationally arising from the dispute of franchise.
A franchisor has a right to investigate and control the business of a franchisee, and has a right to instruct the franchisee to do something needed to carry out the franchise business. A franchisor is liable to support the franchisee, and is liable to supply products and services for the franchisee. A franchisee has a territory right. The franchisee is liable to allow the franchisor franchise fees.
In the contract of franchise, a franchisor should not terminate the franchise contract arbitrarily. The cause of termination must be enumerated concretely and must be reasonable.
In the termination of franchise contract, it is one of the important problem whether the franchise fee could be a return or not. Generally it looks on franchise fee as a penalty. To promise a penalty in case that each party commits a breach of a franchise contract is valid as a rule. However, too heavy a penalty can be reduced to an adequate level. So I think the royalty could be a return.
But the backside of the growth of franchise business, many social problem have occured in franchise business. Especially many franchisee have been damaged by the franchisor who provide exaggerated information or false information.
This dissertation deals with the dispute of franchise and the theoretical ground for a legal issue and a troubleshooting it presented.
This dissertation deals with the legal nature of a franchise contract, the types of the franchise dispute and the returning of franchise fee. In this dissertation I would like to advance a theory to legal problems rationally arising from the dispute of franchise.
A franchisor has a right to investigate and control the business of a franchisee, and has a right to instruct the franchisee to do something needed to carry out the franchise business. A franchisor is liable to support the franchisee, and is liable to supply products and services for the franchisee. A franchisee has a territory right. The franchisee is liable to allow the franchisor franchise fees.
In the contract of franchise, a franchisor should not terminate the franchise contract arbitrarily. The cause of termination must be enumerated concretely and must be reasonable.
In the termination of franchise contract, it is one of the important problem whether the franchise fee could be a return or not. Generally it looks on franchise fee as a penalty. To promise a penalty in case that each party commits a breach of a franchise contract is valid as a rule. However, too heavy a penalty can be reduced to an adequate level. So I think the royalty could be a return.
목차
Ⅰ. 들어가며
Ⅱ. 가맹사업거래 및 그 분쟁의 특징
Ⅲ. 가맹사업거래분쟁의 유형
Ⅳ. 가맹사업거래분쟁에 있어서 개별적 쟁점 및 그 해결
Ⅴ. 마치며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
Ⅱ. 가맹사업거래 및 그 분쟁의 특징
Ⅲ. 가맹사업거래분쟁의 유형
Ⅳ. 가맹사업거래분쟁에 있어서 개별적 쟁점 및 그 해결
Ⅴ. 마치며
참고문헌
〈Abstract〉
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 독일민법 제정 당시의 심리적 의사표시론에 관한 고찰
- 영화제작에 있어 계약유형과 그 법리에 관한 시론
- 動産讓渡公示制度의 改善方案 - 日本의 새로운 動産公示法을 參照하여
- 가맹사업거래(프랜차이즈)분쟁의 유형과 해결방안
- 저작권법상 영상제작자에 관한 고찰
- 사정변경 제도의 성문입법화 시도에 관한 몇 가지 비판적 단상 - 민법중개정법률안 제544조의4를 계기로 한영미법의 Frustration 법리와의 비교ㆍ분석을 통하여
- 중국의 부동산 등기제도와 물권변동
- Friedrich Mommsens Lehre von den Leistungsstörungen -eine Skizze
- 사회주의 부동산이용권의 私權化에 관한 연구
- 독촉절차의 문제점과 개선방안
- 징벌적 손해배상에 관한 미국의 최근 동향
- 附錄
참고문헌
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!