하자중재조항의 사례분석과 시사점

• 영문명: Analysis of the Cases of the Defective Arbitration Clause and Its Effect
• 발행기관: 한국국제상학회
• 저자명: 이주원(Joo-wone Lee) 김경배(Kyung-bae Kim)
• 간행물 정보: 『국제상학』國際商學 제21권 제1호, 133~155쪽, 전체 23쪽
• 주제분류: 경제경영 > 무역학
• 파일형태: PDF
• 발행일자: 2006.03.01

영문 초록

  The international arbitration system has been a useful method of disputes settlement arising from international transactions.   As a precondition in order to use international commercial arbitration, there must be a written arbitration agreement between the parties in the agreement. However, there have been found so many defective arbitration clauses in the contracts, and these defective arbitration clauses have caused the delay of claim settlement or even the inability to arbitrate.   Accordingly, those who are in the actual practice of concluding contracts should keep in mind that they had better choose institutional arbitration than ad-hoc arbitration, should select the arbitration rules of the arbitration institution to be hold arbitration and should consider enforcing the arbitration award.

목차

Abstract
Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 중재합의의 개요
Ⅲ. 하자중재조항 사례분석 및 시사점  
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌

키워드

Ad-hoc Arbitration Defective Arbitration Clause Governing Law Case Study