학술논문
개발제한구역지정에 따른 손실보상 - 헌법제23조와의 관계에 의한 해석론 -
이용수 112
- 영문명
- A Demage Compensation for Appointment of a Development Limited Area - Study on Analysis Theory that is Connected with Constitution Article 23 of Korea -
- 발행기관
- 한국부동산학회
- 저자명
- 김봉채(Kim Bong Chae)
- 간행물 정보
- 『부동산학보』부동산학보 제24집, 5~18쪽, 전체 14쪽
- 주제분류
- 경제경영 > 경영학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.08.01
4,480원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
1. CONTENTS
(1) RESEARCH OBJECTIVES
Purpose of research, reappraising damage compensation theory about greenbelt appointment regarding constitutional law article 23, is to contribute in damage compensation theory development and furthermore to contribute to guarantee in people's property rights.
(2) RESEARCH METHOD
To introduce "Bundesgerichtshof' Schwellentheorie" and "Bundsverfassung -sgericht' Trennungstheorie" of Germany, Examine damage compensation theory of previous our country, and examine and analyze precedent of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court.
(3) RESEARCH RESULTS
Separation theory(Trennungstheorie) of commonwealth Constitutional Court(Bundsverfassungsgericht) of Germany keeps away extension that exceed of accommodation concept, and logical analysis of Germany' constitutional law, respective independence of the three powers, developed analysis of new accommodation theory for people's continued existence guarantee and so on of property rights furthermore.
Separation theory grasps from contents of property rights to problem of legislation formation. Because grasp Germany constitutional law article 14 the first clause, the second clauses to contents of property rights. On the other hand, accommodation grasped by area that need compensation.
Separation theory can be suitable in respective independence of the three powers, and seek variety in civilianizations' property rights guarantee than border theory, and there is advantage that can pare down burdensome business defrayment as court.
2. RESULTS
Examined, regarding damage compensation theory. analysis loan of the Germany Supreme Court and constitutional court and analysis our country Supreme Court and of constitutional court.
The Germany Supreme Court of the United States grasps property rights limitation form into emaciated look with social binding, and social binding is limitation that there is no radish of compensation, and accommodation grasped by social regulation that it is radish of compensation. That is, social regulation is accepted if social regulation omits limit(border theory).
The Germany commonwealth Constitutional Court is prevention of extension that exceed of accommodation concept, logical analysis of Germany fundamental law, respective independence of the three powers, grew new accommodation theory for people's continued existence guarantee of property rights and so on. furthermore. New accommodation theory says that is separation theory or cutting theory, this social binding and expropriation grasp by different area and social binding grasps to contents of property rights, and accommodation grasped by limitation of property rights.
(Germany constitutional law(Verfassungsrecht) article 14 the first clause, the second clauses) There is advantage that can be suitable in priority respective independence of the three powers by advantage of separation theory, and seek variety in people' property rights guarantee, and can pare down burdensome business defrayment as court. Our constitution article 23 is placed in situation similar to Germany by relation similar to Germany. Our Supreme Court falls in love though is gaining border theory and the Constitutional Court is selecting separation theory.
By the way, our constitution is prescribing use as well as accommodation, limitation unlike Germany fundamental law (Verfassungsrecht) from article 23 the third clauses, is recognizing concept of official business infringement extensively more than Germany fundamental law. Close intimacy of greenbelt that is type of qualification of property rights is that do official business saliva and is public opinion type.
And by property restriction in public that appointment of greenbelt is property rights form, must keep package deal clause in case escape limit of social binding. in this case, thing which apply and foretell special sacrifice theory (sonderopfertheorie) by standard that judge if escaped limit of social bind
목차
ABSTRACT
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 公用制限의 性質-社會的 拘束性
Ⅲ. 社會的 拘束性의 限界에 대한 判斷
Ⅳ. 財産權制限 立法(“開制法”)의 違憲性여부
Ⅴ. 結論
參考文獻
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- [권두언] 새로운 환경에 대처할 수 있는 활발한 연구
- 상가임대료의 군집분석을 이용한 시장세분화에 관한 연구 - 서울지역을 중심으로 -
- A Study on the Reform of the Real Property Possession Tax - Centered on the Introduction to Comprehensive Real Estate Tax in Korea -
- 기업도시의 공공성확보를 위한 법적 검토
- 부동산업자의 조세회피성향에 관한 연구
- 주택재개발조합원의 입주부담금에 따른 재입주특성분석
- 최근의 부동산버블과 거시경제 분석 - 1990년대 일본상황과 비교 -
- 再建築規制의 諸 問題
- 우리나라 역모기지제도의 현황과 리스크 대응방안
- 不動産市場調査에서 無應答率의 最小化 方案에 관한 硏究
- 신도시 아파트 건설의 개발이익 분석 - 분당신도시를 사례로 -
- 로지스틱 방정식을 이용한 부동산경기변동과 부동산정책의 분석
- 지하공간활용의 이론적 접근
- 실버산업활성화 방안에 관한 연구
- 상가건물임대차제도의 환산보증금 제한에 대한 고찰 - 부동산중개업자에 대한 설문조사를 통하여 -
- 부동산정책이 부동산가격에 미치는 영향
- 개발제한구역지정에 따른 손실보상 - 헌법제23조와의 관계에 의한 해석론 -
- 미군정기의 귀속재산에 관한 일 고찰
- 기업도시로서 문화관광도시 조성방안
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!