본문 바로가기

추천 검색어

실시간 인기 검색어

학술논문

도덕교육론에서 정의-배려 논쟁 재고찰

이용수 121

영문명
A Reconsideration on Justice-Care Debate in Moral Education
발행기관
한국교육철학회
저자명
진미숙(Jin Misook)
간행물 정보
『교육철학』교육철학 26집, 155~173쪽, 전체 19쪽
주제분류
사회과학 > 교육학
파일형태
PDF
발행일자
2004.12.01
5,080

구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.

1:1 문의
논문 표지

국문 초록

영문 초록

This article aims at clarifying what follows. First, Kohlhergian theory with cognitive-developmental perspective has been criticized by many theorists with feminist perspective, in the process of which we have focused primarily on finding faults with it itself but not on Kohlberg's correspondences to the opponents. So this is pointing to excessive and simplified interpretations by feminist perspective, which are likely to lead to some misunderstandings about Kohlbergian theory, for example, Benhabib's misdoing about Kohlberg's evolutions of scoring method and Meyers' about Kohlberg's constructivist viewpoint. But this article never aims at just criticizing, and rather at asserting the importance of mutual understandings, not standing opposed to each other, from both sides of so-called 'Kohlberg-Gilligan Debate', which understandings, in my imagination, can be taken by re-pointing and re-understanding what we've missed. It is expected that such mutual understandings can contribute to make complementary connection with each other. That is the second aim of this paper. In order to make it possible to complementarily connect with each other, our concerns turn to some core concepts consisting of Stage 6 moral principle, just like reversibility, ideal role taking, sympathy and dialogue. And to comparing the concepts in Kohlberg's main books with those in Kohlberg, Boyd & Levine(1990). It is taken for granted that whoever arrives at Stage 6 perspective has care orientation as well as justice orientation of morality, but we can find out the difference of the way of resolving conflicts at Stage 6 between in the main texts and in the latter article. 'Drawing straws' corresponds to the one and' cooperative discussion' is the other. In addition, this article lays emphasis on a person as 'dialectical being', who gives deep ears to any person he meets in daily life and lets him engage in and act On dialogue toward agreement.

목차

Ⅰ. 서론
Ⅱ. 정의-배려 논쟁에 대한 이해와 오해
Ⅲ. 콜버그의 단계 6 인간존엄성 재음미
Ⅳ. 결론
참고문헌
Abstract

키워드

해당간행물 수록 논문

참고문헌

교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!

신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.

바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!

교보e캐시 1,000원
TOP
인용하기
APA

진미숙(Jin Misook). (2004).도덕교육론에서 정의-배려 논쟁 재고찰. 교육철학, 26 , 155-173

MLA

진미숙(Jin Misook). "도덕교육론에서 정의-배려 논쟁 재고찰." 교육철학, 26.(2004): 155-173

결제완료
e캐시 원 결제 계속 하시겠습니까?
교보 e캐시 간편 결제