학술논문
子女의 最善의 利益과 面接交涉權
이용수 210
- 영문명
- The Best Interests of the Child and Visitation Rights
- 발행기관
- 한국가족법학회
- 저자명
- 김수정(Soo-Jeong Kim)
- 간행물 정보
- 『가족법연구』가족법연구 제19권 1호, 309~347쪽, 전체 39쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.03.01
7,480원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
In deciding visitation dispute, the best interests of the child becomes the primary principle. This Article will consider the relationship between visitation rights and the best interests of the child. The first point is to survey how the Best Interests expand the visitation rights. The second point is to examine if the Best Interests standard should be sole criteria for deciding visitation and on whom the evidentiary burden should rest.
If the Best Interests standard is applied to visitation dispute, interested third parties who are not the divorced parents also can file for visitation. There are diverse relationship which child has interests to maintain, and the relationship is not limited to that between legitimate child and his parents. Granting visitation right to unwed father, whose legal status approaches to that of divorced father, is a recent trend. But in the case of grandparent's access, German Civil Code and Children Act 1989(England) treat grandparent as third party, meanwhile in French Civil Code, grandparent has the same right of access as that of parent. Under the common law the stepparent-stepchild relationship does not itself give rise to any legal rights or obligations, but if visitation is in the best interests of the child stepparent can also petition for visitation now.
The Best Interests principle should be paramount principle, but not the only criteria for deciding visitation disputes. If the best interests standard be the sole criteria, it does yield unjust and inefficient decisions. First, it is liable to yield unjust decisions by neglecting the rights and needs of the parents and third parties. And it yields inefficient decisions if the cost created by restriction on access to the child is substantially greater than the benefit for the child. Second, if a court enters a decree granting visitation of non-custodial person, limitation on the rights of custodial parent is not so great as in the case of custody dispute, therefore it is easier balancing the colliding interests in visitation disputes.
In case that petitioner is non-custodial parent, the evidentiary burden should be placed on the custodial parent since parent has the constitutional right to rear and have access to his or her child. In case that petitioner is a third party, for example stepparent, the burden should be on the third party. Whether the burden places on grandparent or on custodial parent depends on grandparent's status in the nuclear family.
목차
Ⅰ. 序論
Ⅱ. 面接交涉權者의 範圍와 子女의 最善의 利益
Ⅲ. 面接交涉의 決定基準과 子女의 最善의 利益
Ⅳ. 結論
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 民法 一部改正法律案
- 子의 姓에 대한 規定의 比較法的 接近 - 獨逸民法規定의 變遷을 중심으로 -
- 驪松 李凞培 敎授 年譜
- 헌법재판소 - 위헌결정문
- 離婚時 子女養育費 確保方案에 관한 硏究
- 相續法 - 家族法인가, 財産法인가?
- 협의이혼제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구
- 「가족법」상의 법률행위의 특성
- 子女의 最善의 利益과 面接交涉權
- 同時死亡 推定과 配偶者 代襲相續 - 對象判決 : 大法院 2001.3.9. 선고 99다13157 判決
- 현행 민법상 부부재산제의 문제점과 개선방안
- 親權者ㆍ後見人의 代理權과 任意代理의 比較
- 發刊辭
- 신의칙과 권리남용금지원칙의 가족법관계에의 적용
- 미국 혼인법의 개별화 경향 - 혼인전합의법 및 협약혼인법을 중심으로 -
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!