학술논문
미국 혼인법의 개별화 경향 - 혼인전합의법 및 협약혼인법을 중심으로 -
이용수 77
- 영문명
- Personalization of Marriage in American Law - Focussing on Premarital Act and Covenant Marriage Act -
- 발행기관
- 한국가족법학회
- 저자명
- 최진섭(Jin-Sub Choi)
- 간행물 정보
- 『가족법연구』가족법연구 제19권 1호, 139~176쪽, 전체 38쪽
- 주제분류
- 법학 > 법학
- 파일형태
- 발행일자
- 2005.03.01
7,360원
구매일시로부터 72시간 이내에 다운로드 가능합니다.
이 학술논문 정보는 (주)교보문고와 각 발행기관 사이에 저작물 이용 계약이 체결된 것으로, 교보문고를 통해 제공되고 있습니다.
국문 초록
영문 초록
As a result of the change in background rules, the consequences of judicial reluctance to allow antenuptial contracting have reversed over the past thirty years. State policy requiring all marriages to conform to a single set of legal rules was outdated because of the heterogeneity of desirable marriages. The traditional marriage seemed to assume that all couples were young, white, middle-class adults, never married before, who desired a permanent marriage with traditional sex roles and with procreation as a major purpose. Now the laws have changed, but they seem equally rigid, and desire a permanent marriage and traditional sex roles.
Therefore each couple should be given the option to have their marriage governed by traditional rules of marriage and divorce, as enacted in Louisiana and other states. Courts should enforce agreements as to the terms of divorce, at least regarding the division of property and should be authorized to also enforce private agreements regarding grounds for divorce and terms of an ongoing marriage. It is better to foster preferences for extending private control and diminishing governmental control in marital matters.
In the past, religious and social norms defined a “marriage” and the gender roles within a marriage. The law did not allow contractual variations out of keeping with the religious and social norms. As a matter of public policy, it was thought that the interests of society required the fostering of a certain type of marriage, in the interests of child rearing and stability, and the desires of the individual needed to be subordinated to social order. Thus, social norms, religious rules, and legal doctrine prevented people from entering into a marriage agreement that might allow easy dissolution or unusual roles.
Some of the reasons why it was once difficult to contract out of a traditional marriage are clear. But many of those restraints on individual liberty have weakened or disappeared. Prevailing opinion has changed. Although still limited, a marriage today is considered much more a matter for the two parties concerned, not for society. Yet few people entering their first marriage memorialize their shared understandings, obligations, and aspirations by contract. The rarity of individualized contracts is partially explained by inertia and partly by lack of awareness that being bound by marital contracts can be a good thing for both parties. But another reason is that no one can be sure that courts will enforce the contracts. The law has not kept pace with societal sensibilities.
No-fault divorce might seem to foster individual choice, in keeping with the spirit of the age, but it does not really favor individual choice. Some people would like to be able to choose to bind themselves in a permanent marriage, yet the law makes it difficult to personalize the contract. One legal size is presumed to fit all. The chief problem comes in being unable to specify the grounds for divorce, either directly or through using the terms of divorce to penalize a spouse who is at fault. The long-established rule against judicial interference in ongoing marriages further hinders the establishment of individually tailored marriages. Statutes could usefully provide forms with several enforceable and reliable options.
목차
Ⅰ. 머리말
Ⅱ. 혼인법 변화의 배경과 그 영향
Ⅲ. 혼인 전 계약 및 협약혼인의 필요성에 관한 논거
Ⅳ. 혼인전합의법
Ⅴ. 협약혼인법
Ⅵ. 맺음말
참고문헌
Abstract
키워드
해당간행물 수록 논문
- 民法 一部改正法律案
- 子의 姓에 대한 規定의 比較法的 接近 - 獨逸民法規定의 變遷을 중심으로 -
- 驪松 李凞培 敎授 年譜
- 헌법재판소 - 위헌결정문
- 離婚時 子女養育費 確保方案에 관한 硏究
- 相續法 - 家族法인가, 財産法인가?
- 협의이혼제도의 개선방안에 관한 연구
- 「가족법」상의 법률행위의 특성
- 子女의 最善의 利益과 面接交涉權
- 同時死亡 推定과 配偶者 代襲相續 - 對象判決 : 大法院 2001.3.9. 선고 99다13157 判決
- 현행 민법상 부부재산제의 문제점과 개선방안
- 親權者ㆍ後見人의 代理權과 任意代理의 比較
- 發刊辭
- 신의칙과 권리남용금지원칙의 가족법관계에의 적용
- 미국 혼인법의 개별화 경향 - 혼인전합의법 및 협약혼인법을 중심으로 -
참고문헌
관련논문
최근 이용한 논문
교보eBook 첫 방문을 환영 합니다!
신규가입 혜택 지급이 완료 되었습니다.
바로 사용 가능한 교보e캐시 1,000원 (유효기간 7일)
지금 바로 교보eBook의 다양한 콘텐츠를 이용해 보세요!